1970
DOI: 10.1002/j.2161-1920.1970.tb00554.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of the Gatb “G” Score for Predicting Achievement on the Ged

Abstract: The present study investigates the relationship of the GATB “G” with the GED. Practical and theoretical implications are involved. Making use of samples from the Las Vegas, Nevada population, the study compares scores of individuals administered the GED and GATB. A substantial correlation for prediction purposes was devised to illustrate the use of the GATB “G” to predict, by interval, an individual's position on the GED. The expectancy table helps guide the Vocational Counselor with a constructive tool whereb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1975
1975
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A review of the current literature showed no studies that investigated the relationship between the GEPI and the revised GED. Research has utilized other assessment devices in predicting performance on the GED, but the majority of these studies ( Brening, 1969;Kline & Trione, 1970 : Montgomery, 1967) employed the General Aptitude Test Battery (GATB) as the predictor of GED performance. Also, these studies predicted the GED scores prior to the test's revision, and the validity of these studies may now be suspect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A review of the current literature showed no studies that investigated the relationship between the GEPI and the revised GED. Research has utilized other assessment devices in predicting performance on the GED, but the majority of these studies ( Brening, 1969;Kline & Trione, 1970 : Montgomery, 1967) employed the General Aptitude Test Battery (GATB) as the predictor of GED performance. Also, these studies predicted the GED scores prior to the test's revision, and the validity of these studies may now be suspect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%