1980
DOI: 10.1179/cmq.1980.19.1.59
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of the DWTT Energy for Predicting Ductile Fracture Behavior in Controlled-Rolled Steel Line Pipes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These testing methods have correlated well with the actual fracture propagation behavior of conventional pipeline steels that have a CVN USE below 100 J. [7,8] This correlation has become less obviousness, however, with phenomena such as the rising upper shelf, [9] separation, [10] and abnormal fracture appearance [3] occurring during DWTT, because the toughness of pipeline steels has been greatly improved through manufacturing advancements such as controlled rolling and accelerated cooling. As a way to solve this problem, Chevron notch or static precracked DWTT specimens, the notch of which is adjusted so that the fracture-initiation energy is lower than that of the standard pressed-notch DWTT specimen, are used for testing high-toughness pipeline steels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These testing methods have correlated well with the actual fracture propagation behavior of conventional pipeline steels that have a CVN USE below 100 J. [7,8] This correlation has become less obviousness, however, with phenomena such as the rising upper shelf, [9] separation, [10] and abnormal fracture appearance [3] occurring during DWTT, because the toughness of pipeline steels has been greatly improved through manufacturing advancements such as controlled rolling and accelerated cooling. As a way to solve this problem, Chevron notch or static precracked DWTT specimens, the notch of which is adjusted so that the fracture-initiation energy is lower than that of the standard pressed-notch DWTT specimen, are used for testing high-toughness pipeline steels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[3] Because of the longer crack propagation path in DWTT specimens, DWTT absorbed energy was known to be a more reliable parameter to evaluate the propagation resistance to dynamic ductile fracture (DDF) of line-pipe steels than CVN absorbed energy. [9,10,11] However, there still remain problems including uncertainties in the selection criteria of the notch shape of DWTT specimens. In the case of thick steels of over 19 mm in thickness, the test temperature is indiscriminately lowered after the specimen thickness is reduced to 19 mm, which also leads to uncertainties for reliable evaluation of absorbed energy or transition temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O Drop Weight Tear Test (DWTT) é um método de avaliação da tenacidade empregado para assegurar que o aço usado na fabricação de tubos não esteja sujeito à propagação de fratura frágil quando em serviço, ou seja, caso ocorra uma fratura à temperatura mínima de operação, ela se propagará de modo dúctil [1]. No entanto, tem sido verificado que aços modernos para dutos, produzidos via laminação controlada seguida de resfriamento acelerado, que exibem elevadas resistência mecânica e tenacidade em ensaios de impacto Charpy (entre 200 e 350 J no patamar superior) e, especialmente, espessuras acima de 25 mm, podem não apresentar o mesmo comportamento à fratura que os aços convencionais, quando submetidos ao DWTT [2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified