1993
DOI: 10.1109/36.263786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of the Dempster-Shafer algorithm for the detection of SAR ship wakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The power of evidential reasoning stems both from the generality of its formulation, and also Downloaded by [Temple University Libraries] at 18:15 20 November 2014 from the fact that it was designed speci cally to provide a rich set of calculus for combining disparate, multisource data with di V erent properties and levels of information. It has been used in a variety of applications such as medicine (Gordon and Shortli V e 1985), forestry (Goldberg et al 1985), expert systems and arti cial intelligence (Shafer and Logan 1987), route selection (Garvey 1987), geology (Moon 1990(Moon , 1993, classi cation (Srinivasan andRichards 1990, Wilkinson andMégier 1990), water resources (Caselton and Luo 1992) and target detection and reconnaissance studies (Rey et al 1993). In the classi cation context, evidential reasoning regards information from di V erent data sources as individual pieces of evidence over a set of prede ned or hierarchical classes.…”
Section: T He Evidential Reasoning Approachmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The power of evidential reasoning stems both from the generality of its formulation, and also Downloaded by [Temple University Libraries] at 18:15 20 November 2014 from the fact that it was designed speci cally to provide a rich set of calculus for combining disparate, multisource data with di V erent properties and levels of information. It has been used in a variety of applications such as medicine (Gordon and Shortli V e 1985), forestry (Goldberg et al 1985), expert systems and arti cial intelligence (Shafer and Logan 1987), route selection (Garvey 1987), geology (Moon 1990(Moon , 1993, classi cation (Srinivasan andRichards 1990, Wilkinson andMégier 1990), water resources (Caselton and Luo 1992) and target detection and reconnaissance studies (Rey et al 1993). In the classi cation context, evidential reasoning regards information from di V erent data sources as individual pieces of evidence over a set of prede ned or hierarchical classes.…”
Section: T He Evidential Reasoning Approachmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…All of them are uses characterized by very low radar cross section targets embedded in strong clutter and not easily differentiable using Doppler processing. Conventional Track Before Detection (TBD) techniques [8], [9] are no more well suited, and new processing schemes have to be included in order to detect targets rivaling the sea clutter [10], [11]. Its behavior, or statistical characterization, is no more "classic," due to HRR features [12], and requires new studies in order to improve the detection algorithms.…”
Section: A Clutter Power Reductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Dempster-Shafer approach provides a heuristic basis for combining evidence from diverse and multi-source data sets and has been applied to problems of remote sensing image classification (Lee et al 1987;Srinivasan and Richards, 1990), geology (Moon, 1990(Moon, , 1993, water resources (Caselton and Luo, 1992), detecting ship wakes on SAR imagery (Rey et al,1993),route selection (Garvey, 1987),and as an interface to expert systems (Goldberg et al, 1985;Wilkinson and Megier, 1990) to measure the level of uncertainties in hypothesis testing. Although considerably less attention has been directed towards the use of DempsterShafer theory for remote sensing image classification compared to well-established neural network approaches, there is, nonetheless, an increasing recognition of the power of evidential reasoning for classifying higher-dimensional multi-source data sets with diverse statistical properties and for handling the inherent information uncertainty and conflicting knowledge typical of divergent data sources.…”
Section: Evidential Reasoning Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%