2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:jcfs.0000022038.62940.a3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of the CAFAS to Evaluate Outcome for Youths with Severe Emotional Disturbance Served by Public Mental Health

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total CAFAS mean scores at pretest were in the marked impairment range (over 90) and although still in the moderate range (50-90) at posttest, the mean decreased approximately 30 points. A 20 point decrease in the CAFAS or PECAFAS scores for an individual indicate a measurable improvement in functioning (Hodges et al 2004) and was observed in 15 of the 23 CAFAS or PCAFAS scores (65%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total CAFAS mean scores at pretest were in the marked impairment range (over 90) and although still in the moderate range (50-90) at posttest, the mean decreased approximately 30 points. A 20 point decrease in the CAFAS or PECAFAS scores for an individual indicate a measurable improvement in functioning (Hodges et al 2004) and was observed in 15 of the 23 CAFAS or PCAFAS scores (65%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independent samples t-tests revealed no significant differences between children living with their biological families versus those living in foster care on their most recent CAFAS/ PECFAS total score, t(52.70) = 0.717, ns, or on any of the CAFAS/PECFAS subscale scores, all p [ 0.05. Categorical indicators revealed no significant differences in the number of children who achieved clinically significant change, as defined by a 20-point or greater improvement in CAFAS/PECFAS total score (Hodges et al 2004), v 2 (1) = 0.334, p = 0.53, or on the percentage of children achieving the ''end of services'' target CAFAS/PECAFS total score of 40 or less (Hodges et al 2004), v 2 (1) = 2.051, p = 0.22. A Mann-Whitney test indicated that children living with their biological families had significantly more severe subscales on their most recent CAFAS/PECFAS, U = 2682.00, p = 0.022.…”
Section: Differences In Outcome Between Foster Versus Non-foster Chilmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…At entry into Wraparound services, youth were categorized into one of seven CAFAS tiers (in order from most severe to least severe impairment; Hodges, Xue, & Wotring, 2004) …”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%