Use of the 'Air Wave System' to Prevent Pressure Sores in Hospital

Smith, Andrew; Wedgwood, J; Overstall, P. W.; Wallace, Gerry

doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(82)92851-3

Cited by 80 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 2 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…82 The study by Conine and colleagues 82 studied patients quite dissimilar from those in this trial, namely, people with neurological disease aged between 18 and 55 years. The studies most similar to this one, evaluating some form of alternating pressure mattress in (mainly) older hospital patients, reported pressure ulcer risk on alternating pressure as follows: Hampton 0, 80 Taylor 0 and 9%, 81 Price 2%, 83 Gebhardt 16%, 84 Exton-Smith 16% and 39% 85 and Stapleton 34%. 86 Clearly, the risk of ulceration reported in the PRESSURE Trial (10%) is consistent with these wide-ranging figures.…”

Section: Comparison With Similar Studiesmentioning

confidence: 88%

Pressure relieving support surfaces: a randomised evaluation

Nixon¹,

Nelson²,

Cranny³

et al. 2006

Health Technol Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Non-UK purchasers will have to pay a small fee for post and packing. For European countries the cost is £2 per monograph and for the rest of the world £3 per monograph.You can order HTA monographs from our Despatch Agents:-fax (with credit card or official purchase order) -post (with credit card or official purchase order or cheque) -phone during office hours (credit card only).Additionally the HTA website allows you either to pay securely by credit card or to print out your order and then post or fax it. Contact Payment methods Paying by chequeIf you pay by cheque, the cheque must be in pounds sterling, made payable to Direct Mail Works Ltd and drawn on a bank with a UK address. Paying by credit cardThe following cards are accepted by phone, fax, post or via the website ordering pages: Delta, Eurocard, Mastercard, Solo, Switch and Visa. We advise against sending credit card details in a plain email. Paying by official purchase orderYou can post or fax these, but they must be from public bodies (i.e. NHS or universities) within the UK.We cannot at present accept purchase orders from commercial companies or from outside the UK. How do I get a copy of HTA on CD?Please use the form on the HTA website (www.hta.ac.uk/htacd.htm). Or contact Direct Mail Works (see contact details above) by email, post, fax or phone. HTA on CD is currently free of charge worldwide.The website also provides information about the HTA Programme and lists the membership of the various committees. HTA NHS R&D HTA ProgrammeT he research findings from the NHS R&D Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme directly influence key decision-making bodies such as the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and the National Screening Committee (NSC) who rely on HTA outputs to help raise standards of care. HTA findings also help to improve the quality of the service in the NHS indirectly in that they form a key component of the 'National Knowledge Service' that is being developed to improve the evidence of clinical practice throughout the NHS.The HTA Programme was set up in 1993. Its role is to ensure that high-quality research information on the costs, effectiveness and broader impact of health technologies is produced in the most efficient way for those who use, manage and provide care in the NHS. 'Health technologies' are broadly defined to include all interventions used to promote health, prevent and treat disease, and improve rehabilitation and long-term care, rather than settings of care.The HTA Programme commissions research only on topics where it has identified key gaps in the evidence needed by the NHS. Suggestions for topics are actively sought from people working in the NHS, the public, service-users groups and professional bodies such as Royal Colleges and NHS Trusts.Research suggestions are carefully considered by panels of independent experts (including service users) whose advice results in a ranked list of recommended research priorities. The HTA Programme then commissions the research team best suited to und...

show abstract

Section: Comparison With Similar Studiesmentioning

confidence: 88%

Pressure relieving support surfaces: a randomised evaluation

Nixon¹,

Nelson²,

Cranny³

et al. 2006

Health Technol Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Of five clinical trials on the effect of different types of alternating pressure air support on pressure ulcer incidence, only one found one type of alternating pressure air support to be superior to another (Exton‐Smith et al . ), and when the results of this study were analysed according to the intention to treat rather than the protocol, the statistical significance of the difference disappeared (McInnes et al . ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 86%

“…The most recent reviews on the effect of support surfaces on pressure ulcer onset found no clear evidence on the comparative effectiveness of different types of alternating pressure air support (McInnes et al 2008). Of five clinical trials on the effect of different types of alternating pressure air support on pressure ulcer incidence, only one found one type of alternating pressure air support to be superior to another (Exton-Smith et al 1982), and when the results of this study were analysed according to the intention to treat rather than the protocol, the statistical significance of the difference disappeared (McInnes et al 2008). A large and robust trial in surgical patients found no difference in clinical effectiveness between alternating pressure air mattresses and overlays (RR: 1Á04; 95% CI: 0Á81 to 1Á35), but reported that overlays were probably more cost effective (Nixon et al 2006).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A Cochrane review and various clinical trials found no differences in the effectiveness of the different types of alternating pressure air surface to prevent pressure ulcers (Exton‐Smith et al . , Hampton , Taylor , Theaker et al . , Nixon et al .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…mattress or overlay (Vanderwee et al 2008). A Cochrane review and various clinical trials found no differences in the effectiveness of the different types of alternating pressure air surface to prevent pressure ulcers (Exton-Smith et al 1982, Hampton 1997, Taylor 1999, Theaker et al 2005, Nixon et al 2006, McInnes et al 2008. However, the methods used in some of these trials have been questioned (McInnes et al 2008), and most were conducted in care centres for the older people or in non-critical hospitalized patients.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Comparison of alternating pressure mattresses and overlays for prevention of pressure ulcers in ventilated intensive care patients: a quasi‐experimental study

Manzano

Perez

Colmenero

et al. 2013

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Preventing Pressure Ulcers: A Systematic Review

Reddy

Gill²,

Rochon³

2006

JAMA

693

483

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Given current evidence, using support surfaces, repositioning the patient, optimizing nutritional status, and moisturizing sacral skin are appropriate strategies to prevent pressure ulcers. Although a number of RCTs have evaluated preventive strategies for pressure ulcers, many of them had important methodological limitations. There is a need for well-designed RCTs that follow standard criteria for reporting nonpharmacological interventions and that provide data on cost-effectiveness for these interventions.

show abstract

Use of the 'Air Wave System' to Prevent Pressure Sores in Hospital

Cited by 80 publications

References 2 publications

Pressure relieving support surfaces: a randomised evaluation

Pressure relieving support surfaces: a randomised evaluation

Comparison of alternating pressure mattresses and overlays for prevention of pressure ulcers in ventilated intensive care patients: a quasi‐experimental study

Preventing Pressure Ulcers: A Systematic Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About