2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-8223(02)90190-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of surrogate respondents in a case control study of dietary risk factors for Alzheimer's disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, we reported the results of 2 studies comparing responses from our first 50 control group members with responses from their surrogates on a variety of measures. 16,17 Generally, we found no systematic underreporting or overreporting by the surrogates for the control group members across a wide array of variables. Hence, we conclude that if there are biases in the responses of the surrogates for the AD cases in our study, they are not likely to be canceled out by using surrogates for control group members.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previously, we reported the results of 2 studies comparing responses from our first 50 control group members with responses from their surrogates on a variety of measures. 16,17 Generally, we found no systematic underreporting or overreporting by the surrogates for the control group members across a wide array of variables. Hence, we conclude that if there are biases in the responses of the surrogates for the AD cases in our study, they are not likely to be canceled out by using surrogates for control group members.…”
mentioning
confidence: 55%
“…We have previously shown that self-reporting of control group members did not introduce systematic biases in responses across a variety of measures. 16,17 Measures Educational attainment. Education was measured in terms of the highest year of schooling completed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%