Use of Submaximal Repetition Tests for Predicting 1-RM Strength in Class Athletes

Morales, Jacobo; Sobonya, Steve

doi:10.1519/1533-4287(1996)010<0186:uosrtf>2.3.co;2

Cited by 19 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, several studies have reported that this relationship is curvilinear ( LeSuer et al, 1997 ; Mayhew, Ware & Prinster, 1993 ). Also, nearly every paper or study the NSCA estimation tables for 1-RM ( Baechle & Earle, 2000 ) was based upon, used the back squat, power clean, or bench press to estimate 1-RM ( Brzycki, 1993 ; Chapman, Whitehead & Binkert, 1998 ; Epley, 1985 ; Lander, 1985 ; Mayhew et al, 1992 ; Morales & Sobonya, 1996 ), which were not measured pre- and post in the study conducted by McNamara & Stearne (2010) . McNamara & Stearne (2010) also did not account for the number of repetitions targeted.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of subjective and objective autoregulation methods for intensity and volume on enhancing maximal strength during resistance-training interventions: a systematic review

Larsen

Kristiansen

Tillaar

2021

PeerJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Maximal strength is a critical determinant of performance in numerous sports. Autoregulation is a resistance training prescription approach to adjust training variables based on the individuals’ daily fluctuations in performance, which are a result of training-induced fitness and fatigue, together with readiness from daily non-training stressors. Objective This review aimed to summarise the effects of different subjective and objective autoregulation methods for intensity and volume on enhancing maximal strength. Materials and Methods A comprehensive literature search was conducted through SPORTDiscus, PubMed and Google Scholar. Studies had to meet the following criteria to be included in the review: (1) estimation of 1-RM or a 1-RM test for both pre-test and post-test to measure progression in strength assessment during the training intervention, (2) a training comparison group, (3) participants were healthy, (4) the article had a detailed description of training intensity, training volume, and training frequency during the training intervention, (5) the training intervention lasted for more than four weeks, (6) studies with objective autoregulation methods utilised a validated measuring tool to monitor velocity, (7) English-language studies. Results Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 30 training groups and 356 participants. Effect size and percentage differences were calculated for 13 out of 14 studies to compare the effects of different training interventions. All autoregulation training protocols resulted in an increase in 1-RM, from small ES to large ES. Conclusion Overall, our findings suggest that using both subjective autoregulation methods for intensity, such as repetitions in reserve rating of perceived exertion and flexible daily undulation periodisation, together with objective autoregulation methods for autoregulation intensity and volume, such as velocity targets and velocity loss, could be effective methods for enhancing maximal strength. It is speculated that this is because the implementation of autoregulation into a periodised plan may take into account the athletes’ daily fluctuations, such as fluctuations in fitness, fatigue, and readiness to train. When training with a validated measuring tool to monitor velocity, this may provide objective augmented intra- and interset feedback during the resistance exercise who could be beneficial for increasing maximal strength. Coaches, practitioners, and athletes are encouraged to implement such autoregulation methods into a periodised plan when the goal is to enhance maximal strength.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of subjective and objective autoregulation methods for intensity and volume on enhancing maximal strength during resistance-training interventions: a systematic review

Larsen

Kristiansen

Tillaar

2021

PeerJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In resistance training programmes, training load for a given set of an exercise is prescribed in terms of both intensity (the weight to be lifted relative to the person's capabilities) and volume (the number of repetitions) [ 24 ]. It has been clearly established that there is an inverse relationship between the weight to be lifted and the number of repetitions that can be performed [ 18 , 19 ]. This relationship is of key importance for a coach in prescribing the appropriate load.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…An influential example of this is a table presented by Baechle et al [ 3 ] which is often used to establish the relationship between 1RM and number of repetitions. In particular, the evidence on which this table is based is largely taken from non-peer reviewed literature ( Table 1 ; [ 2 , 4 , 5 , 8 , 17 – 19 , 27 ]). It should be noted that Baechle et al do acknowledge the potential variability in this relationship and in the literature exploring it, and give appropriate caveats and guidelines for the use of the table.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Relationship Between the Number of Repetitions Performed at Given Intensities Is Different in Endurance and Strength Trained Athletes

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prescribing training intensity and volume is a key problem when designing resistance training programmes. One approach is to base training prescription on the number of repetitions performed at a given percentage of repetition maximum due to the correlation found between these two measures. However, previous research has raised questions as to the accuracy of this method, as the repetitions completed at different percentages of 1RM can differ based upon the characteristics of the athlete. The objective of this study was therefore to evaluate the effect of an athlete's training background on the relationship between the load lifted (as a percentage of one repetition maximum) and the number of repetitions achieved. Eight weightlifters and eight endurance runners each completed a one repetition maximum test on the leg press and completed repetitions to fatigue at 90, 80 and 70% of their one repetition maximum. The endurance runners completed significantly more repetitions than the weightlifters at 70% (39.9 ± 17.6 versus 17.9 ± 2.8; p < 0.05) and 80% (19.8 ± 6.4 versus 11.8 ± 2.7; p < 0.05) of their one repetition maximum but not at 90% (10.8 ± 3.9 versus 7.0 ± 2.1; p > 0.05) of one repetition maximum. These differences could be explained by the contrasting training adaptations demanded by each sport. This study suggests that traditional guidelines may underestimate the potential number of repetitions that can be completed at a given percentage of 1RM, particularly for endurance trained athletes.

show abstract

“…El peso inicial debe permitir que la expresión de fuerza sea significativa y produzca una adecuada estimulación neural, esta es la razón por la que el peso inicial es aproximadamente el 30% de 1RM (Siff, 2004). El número de series fue de 4, con el fin de evitar la fatiga y los efectos negativos de ésta en el rendimiento de las últimas series del test (Morales & Sobonya, 1996). Para determinar el aumento de peso entre series se utilizó la fórmula (1RM estimado (kg) -peso inicial (kg)) / (Total series -1) = KIES (kg a incrementar en cada serie) (Naclerio, Jiménez, Alvar & Peterson, 2009).…”

Section: Procedimientounclassified

Cambios en la fuerza de miembros inferiores tras un mesociclo de pretemporada en futbolistas semiprofesionales (Changes in leg muscle strength after a pre-season mesocycle in semiprofessional soccer players)

Gonzalez-Millán¹,

Coso²,

Abián-Vicén³

et al. 2015

Retos

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objetivo. El objetivo del estudio fue analizar los efectos de un mesociclo de pretemporada que incluía un entrenamiento de fuerza en la capacidad de salto y la fuerza y potencia del tren inferior. Material y método. En el estudio participaron ocho futbolistas semi profesionales pertenecientes a un equipo filial de un equipo de élite. Realizaron un mesociclo de pretemporada que incluía un entrenamiento de fuerza una vez a la semana durante once semanas. Antes y después de la pretemporada se midió la altura de salto en un salto con contramovimiento (CMJ) en una plataforma de contacto, se calculó el peso máximo con el que podían realizar una repetición completa en semi sentadilla (1RM) y se midió la potencia muscular desarrollada en este ejercicio con diferentes porcentajes de carga (Pot1=30% 1RM, Pot2= 44% 1RM, Pot3= 58% 1RM, Pot4= 72% 1RM) a través de un encoder rotatorio. Resultados. La potencia muscular se incrementó en las cuatro cargas (Pot 1 de 785±106 a 1010±143 W; p<0.05. Pot 2: de 1081±165 a 1295±198 W; p<0.05. Pot 3: de 1208±216 a 1407±205 W;p<0.05. Pot 4: de 1304±212 a 1576±406 W; p<0.05) y se incrementó el 1RM (de 125±11.7 kg; a 159±11.1 kg; p<0.05) tras el mesociclo de pretemporada. No se produjeron mejoras en la capacidad de salto (p>0.05). Conclusiones. Tras un mesociclo de pretemporada que incluía un entrenamiento semanal de fuerza, se producen mejoras en el 1RM y en la potencia en media sentadilla, pero estos aumentos de fuerza en miembros inferiores no produjeron una mejora en la capacidad de salto. Palabras clave: fútbol, pretemporada, fuerza, potencia, salto.Abstract: Purpose. The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of a preseason strength training mesocyle on jump performance and leg muscle force and power. Methods. Eight semiprofessional soccer players of the same elite soccer team participated in the study. The preseason strength training mesocycle consisted of lower body weightlifting exercises once a week during eleven weeks. Before and after the preseason mesocycle, jump height was measured by using a countermovement jump (CMJ) on a contact platform. In addition, before and after the mesocycle, one-repetition maximum (1RM) in half-squat exercise was measured and the leg muscle power generated at different percentages of 1RM (Pot1=30% 1RM, Pot2= 44% 1RM, Pot3= 58% 1RM, Pot4= 72% 1RM) was measured by using a rotatory encoder. Results. After the strength training mesocycle, leg muscle power increased at Pot 1 (from785±106 to 1010±143 W; p<0.05), Pot 2 (1081±165 to 1295±198 W;p<0.05), Pot 3 (1208±216 to 1407±205 W; p<0.05) and at (Pot 4: 1304±212 to 1576±406 W; p<0.05). Half-squat 1RM was also increased after the training mesocycle (125±11.7 kg; to 159±11.1 kg; p<0.05). However, there were no improvements in the jump ability after the training (p>0.05). Conclusions. A preseason strength training mesocycle with lower body weightlifting exercises once a week improved half-squat 1RM and leg muscle power. However, these leg muscle force enhancements did not translated into an improved jump ability.Key words: soccer, preseason, strength, power, jump.

show abstract

Use of Submaximal Repetition Tests for Predicting 1-RM Strength in Class Athletes

Cited by 19 publications

References 0 publications

Effects of subjective and objective autoregulation methods for intensity and volume on enhancing maximal strength during resistance-training interventions: a systematic review

Effects of subjective and objective autoregulation methods for intensity and volume on enhancing maximal strength during resistance-training interventions: a systematic review

The Relationship Between the Number of Repetitions Performed at Given Intensities Is Different in Endurance and Strength Trained Athletes

Cambios en la fuerza de miembros inferiores tras un mesociclo de pretemporada en futbolistas semiprofesionales (Changes in leg muscle strength after a pre-season mesocycle in semiprofessional soccer players)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About