2022
DOI: 10.1007/s44169-021-00004-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Soil Invertebrate Avoidance Tests as an Emerging Tool in Soil Ecotoxicology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A positive NR indicated an avoidance of the contaminated substrate, whereas a negative value indicated an attraction to the tested contaminant (Gainer et al 2022 ; Xu et al 2020 ). According to the standard protocol (ISO- 17512 – 1 , 2008 ), the soil has limited habitat function if the positive NR is higher than 70%; this occurs when at least 80% of earthworms avoid the treated substrate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A positive NR indicated an avoidance of the contaminated substrate, whereas a negative value indicated an attraction to the tested contaminant (Gainer et al 2022 ; Xu et al 2020 ). According to the standard protocol (ISO- 17512 – 1 , 2008 ), the soil has limited habitat function if the positive NR is higher than 70%; this occurs when at least 80% of earthworms avoid the treated substrate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variability in the no-observed-adverse-effect level is undoubtedly linked to various factors such as substrate properties, earthworm species (Calisi et al 2011 ; Duan et al 2016 ; Karimi et al 2021 ), earthworm development stage and Cu formulation administered (Gainer et al 2022 ; Wang et al 2018 ). In Helling et al ( 2000 ), for example, adverse effects were already measured on the earthworms’ growth at 8.92 mg/kg soil Cu, but it should be noted that freshly hatched earthworms were used instead of clitellate earthworms, as in the present study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variability in the no-observed-adverse-effect level is undoubtedly linked to various factors such as substrate properties, earthworm species (Calisi et al 2011;Duan et al 2016;Karimi et al 2021), earthworm development stage and Cu formulation administered (Gainer et al 2022;Wang et al 2018). In Helling et al (2000), for example, adverse effects were already measured on the earthworms' growth at 8.92 mg/kg soil Cu, but it should be noted that freshly hatched earthworms were used instead of clitellate earthworms, as in the present study.…”
Section: Avoidance and Reproductive Outputsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A positive NR indicated an avoidance of the contaminated substrate, whereas a negative value indicated an attraction to the tested contaminant (Gainer et al 2022;Xu et al 2020). According to the standard protocol (ISO-17512-1, 2008), the soil has limited habitat function if the positive NR is higher than 70%; this occurs when at least 80% of earthworms avoid the treated substrate.…”
Section: Avoidance and Reproductive Outputsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that Bacillus cereus affected the avoidance response behaviour and the varying results of the CuOx200 mg/kg treatment in this study support the idea that other factors such as temperature and soil moisture changes can affect the avoidance response behaviour of earthworms. For some organisms, avoiding contaminants functions as a survival mechanism to reduce exposure to harmful substances, and the ecological consequence of their response can impact populations in the same way as lethal effects, possibly leading to population extinction(Gainer et al 2022). not observed in the CuOx1000 mg/kg treatment, it indicates a signi cant response at different temperatures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%