2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of slaked lime and Portland cement to improve the resistance of MSWI bottom ash-GBFS geopolymer concrete against carbonation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 4 shows worse durability properties towards carbonation for geopolymer concretes than Portland ones. This evidence can be explained by several findings deduced in Portland media: (a) CSH gel has intrinsic resistance to carbonation and the reaction with liquid-phase CO 2 is very slow; (b) the presence of CAH crystals leads to the formation of insoluble CaCO 3 phases which reduces the overall porosity of the material [ 83 ]. In geopolymer materials, the penetration of CO 2 produces Na 2 CO 3 or K 2 CO 3 components that are highly soluble in water and easily dissolvable, increasing the porosity and permeability characteristics [ 91 ].…”
Section: Geopolymer Vs Ordinary Pc Mixes: a Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 shows worse durability properties towards carbonation for geopolymer concretes than Portland ones. This evidence can be explained by several findings deduced in Portland media: (a) CSH gel has intrinsic resistance to carbonation and the reaction with liquid-phase CO 2 is very slow; (b) the presence of CAH crystals leads to the formation of insoluble CaCO 3 phases which reduces the overall porosity of the material [ 83 ]. In geopolymer materials, the penetration of CO 2 produces Na 2 CO 3 or K 2 CO 3 components that are highly soluble in water and easily dissolvable, increasing the porosity and permeability characteristics [ 91 ].…”
Section: Geopolymer Vs Ordinary Pc Mixes: a Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pH environment (pH = 11.55, see Table 2 ) that formed by liquid sodium silicate was too low (pH = 11.55, see Table 2 ) to reach a high alkali potential (pH 14). This high alkali potential in turn is needed to promote the precipitation of active substances from BA and GGBFS and could not promote the fusion of active substances to form C-S-H (which is favorable for the formation when the pH ranges between 13 and 14) and C-A-S-H gels (which is favorable for the formation when the pH exceeds 14) [ 39 ]. Therefore, the formation of C-S-H and C-A-S-H gels was significantly reduced in sample A-5 as a result of the significant deficiency of the precipitation of active substances, which seriously hindered the strength development [ 40 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e chemical reactions including the precipitation of calcium silicoaluminate gel (CASH) and sodium silicoaluminate gel (NASH) may occur during the process of setting and hardening, then forming a three-dimensional aluminum silicate network structure which consists of AlO 4 and SiO 4 tetrahedral structure units, which could be used to seal the contaminants tightly in the cavity [30,31].…”
Section: Alkaline Activated Cementmentioning
confidence: 99%