Use of Selected Telemedicine Tools in Monitoring Quality of In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Prospective Observational Pilot Simulation Study

Więch, Paweł; Sałacińska, Izabela; Muster, Marek; Bazaliński, Dariusz; Kucaba, Grzegorz; Fąfara, Anna; Przybek-Mita, Joanna; Januszewicz, Paweł

doi:10.12659/msm.913191

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The pandemic and the consequent lockdowns introduced major changes in behavior regarding work, cooperation, and learning [ 14 ]. Regular training is important in increasing willingness and confidence when performing CPR [ 15 , 16 ]. The offline CPR courses were paused because of lock-down strategies.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality during the pandemic of COVID-19

Liu

Wang

et al. 2022

BMC Emerg Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is an important technique of first aid. It is necessary to be popularized. Large-scale offline training has been affected after the outbreak of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Online training will be the future trend, but the quality of online assessment is unclear. This study aims to compare online and offline evaluations of CPR quality using digital simulator and specialist scoring methods. Methods Forty-eight out of 108 contestants who participated in the second Chinese National CPR Skill Competition held in 2020 were included in this study. The competition comprised two stages. In the preliminary online competition, the contestants practiced on the digital simulator while the specialist teams scored live videos. The final competition was held offline, and consisted of live simulator scoring and specialist scoring. The grades of the simulator and specialists in different stages were compared. Results There was no statistical significance for simulator grades between online and offline competition(37.7 ± 2.0 vs. 36.4 ± 3.4, p = 0.169). For specialists’ grades, the video scores were lower than live scores (55.0 ± 1.4 vs. 57.2 ± 1.7, p < 0.001). Conclusion Simulator scoring provided better reliability than specialist scoring in the online evaluation of CPR quality. However, the simulator could only collect quantified data. Specialist scoring is necessary in conjunction with online tests to provide a comprehensive evaluation. A complete and standardized CPR quality evaluation system can be established by combining simulator and specialist contributions.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality during the pandemic of COVID-19

Liu

Wang

et al. 2022

BMC Emerg Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Telehealth Training During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Feasibility Study of Large Group Multiplatform Telesimulation Training

Brei

Neches

Gray

et al. 2021

Telemedicine and e-Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Impact of Using DASH First Element as a Pre-Briefing Tool on Nurse Competency and Learning during Code Blue Simulation: A Mixed-Methods Study

Villar

Nashwan

Silang

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Simulation in healthcare is a growing teaching modality that allows undergraduate and graduate nurses to improve their clinical practice, communication skills, critical thinking, and team performance in a real-world clinical setting. Aim: The aim of the study was to determine if significant associations exist in the groups (control and experimental), the impact on competency performance during a code blue simulation (cardiac arrests in adults), and the learning experiences of nurses when using the 1st element of Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH) as the pre-briefing guide. Design: This study employed a mixed-methods design for collecting quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative portion was guided by a quasi-experimental design with a convenient sample of 120 nurses, while to uncover the meaning of the individual’s experience, a qualitative, phenomenological research design was used with a purposeful sample of 15 nurses. We utilized descriptive and inferential statistics for the quantitative data and phenomenological analysis for the qualitative data. Results: A total of N=120 nurses participated in the study, and 15 nurses from the experimental group were interviewed. There were 60 participants randomly selected for each of the control and experimental groups. The majority of participants in both the control group and the experimental group are males (90.83%). Most of the participants (98.33%) have more than 3 years of nursing experience. Regarding the specialty of nurses in the control group, an equal number were drawn from each of the five nursing specialties. Among the specialties of the nurses in the experimental groups are ED, OPD, CCU, MED-SURG, and PERI-OP. There was a statistically significant difference between the control and experimental groups in competency performance during the Code Blue simulation, p=0.00001. Aside from the age, the years of experience also have a significant effect on the CCEI scores, with p-values of 0.0232 and 0.0239, respectively, in the experimental group. No association was found between gender and specialization to competency performance. Five (5) themes were drawn from this study: (1) setting the tone; (2) reducing stress levels and improving confidence; (3) establishing a safe learning environment; (4) a positive impact on overall perceptions of pre-briefing; and (5) Expectation vs Reality. Conclusions: Utilizing the 1st element of DASH improves competency performance and learning experience among experienced nurses in code blue simulation. Regardless of experience and specialization, nurses who participated in pre-briefing have better CCEI scores. Furthermore, the impact on the overall perception about pre-briefing promotes learning and engagement among experienced nurses. Despite establishing fiction contract and a safe learning environment, experienced nurses will still have anxiety, stress, and dissatisfaction in the realism of simulation.

show abstract

Use of Selected Telemedicine Tools in Monitoring Quality of In-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Prospective Observational Pilot Simulation Study

Cited by 4 publications

References 30 publications

Evaluation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality during the pandemic of COVID-19

Evaluation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality during the pandemic of COVID-19

Telehealth Training During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Feasibility Study of Large Group Multiplatform Telesimulation Training

The Impact of Using DASH First Element as a Pre-Briefing Tool on Nurse Competency and Learning during Code Blue Simulation: A Mixed-Methods Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About