1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-7012(97)00041-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of rhizosphere carbon sources in sole carbon source tests to discriminate soil microbial communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
171
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 337 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
171
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in the analysed indicators in the objects treated with post-floatation lime and wool and containing small amounts of nutrients may have been caused by adaptation of the microorganisms to the culture conditions, which were rich in substrates. As suggested by Campbell et al (1997), the differences in the content of the substrates between the culture conditions and the analysed soil may result in different microbial activities in these dissimilar environments. Investigations conducted by other authors (Fierer et al, 2007;Hattori and Hattori, 1980;Joniec et al, 2015) have shown that microorganisms with low nutritional requirements proliferate intensively in a nutrient-rich environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increase in the analysed indicators in the objects treated with post-floatation lime and wool and containing small amounts of nutrients may have been caused by adaptation of the microorganisms to the culture conditions, which were rich in substrates. As suggested by Campbell et al (1997), the differences in the content of the substrates between the culture conditions and the analysed soil may result in different microbial activities in these dissimilar environments. Investigations conducted by other authors (Fierer et al, 2007;Hattori and Hattori, 1980;Joniec et al, 2015) have shown that microorganisms with low nutritional requirements proliferate intensively in a nutrient-rich environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As suggested by Campbell et al (1997), the differences in the utilisation of substrates between culture conditions and the analysed soil may result in differences in the intensity of microbial activity in these dissimilar environments. Furthermore, Ros et al (2008) argue that Biolog CLPPs do not reflect the functional capacities of the entire soil microbial community, but only reflect the capacities of a very limited subset of microbial genera.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As a consequence, the color development observed cannot be interpreted in terms of the number of utilizers or the metabolic potential of the original microbial community (Haack et al, 1995). Other potential drawbacks of the Biolog method include the fact that the C sources tested are not necessarily those found in soil and they are present in high concentrations (Campbell et al, 1997). Despite these criticisms, Biolog has been used to assess the impacts of various environmental factors on microbial communities (Gremion et al, 2004;Mäder et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shifts in Biolog metabolic diversity patterns are related to shifts in community composition (Haack et al 1995). CLPPs, based on Biolog Ecoplates, have shown to be an appropriate indicator of functional diversity and activity of soil microorganisms in metabolizing carbon substrates (Campbell et al 1997;Chen et al 2010). Although the outcomes reflected only patterns of carbon source utilization during the Ecoplate incubation period and only select metabolic functions were represented in the Ecoplates (Preston-Mafham et al 2002;Zheng et al 2005), CLPPs provide a fast and sensitive way to equally compare functional characteristics of soil microbial communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%