Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.1149/2.0431702jes
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Redox Probes for Characterization of Layer-by-Layer Gold Nanoparticle-Modified Screen-Printed Carbon Electrodes

Abstract: The electrochemical characteristics of bare and surface-modified screen-printed carbon electrodes (SPCEs) were compared using voltammetric responses of common redox probes to determine the potential role of nanomaterials in previously documented signal enhancement. SPCEs modified with gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) by layer-by-layer (LbL) electrostatic adsorption were previously reported to exhibit an increase in voltammetric signal for Fe(CN) 6 3−/4− that corresponds to an improvement of 102% in electroactive sur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To investigate the possible reason for this selectively increased electroactivity, the electroactive area of the untreated and LIFT treated Pt electrodes, respectively, has been determined by studying the electroactivity of the [Fe(CN) 6 ] 4− /[Fe(CN) 6 ] 3− redox couple. The electroactive area measurements, were estimated according to Randles–Sevcik equation (Equation (1)) by CV experiments at scan rate between 0.005 and 0.5 V s −1 in 10 mM [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3− in 0.4 M KCl: Ip = (2.69 × 10 5 )n 3/2 AD 1/2 C v 1/2 , where Ip is the peak current in amperes, n the number of exchanged electrons ( n = 1 for ferricyanide/ferrocyanide red-ox pair), A the electrode area in cm 2 , D the diffusion coefficient (D = 7.60 × 10 −6 cm 2 s −1 for ferricyanide 10 mM in KCl 0.4 M [26]), C the concentration in mol cm −3 and v the sweep rate in V s −1 [27]. Surprisingly, the measured electroactive areas were found similar (8.1 × 10 −2 cm 2 for the untreated and 6.4 × 10 −2 cm 2 for the phosphate buffer 0.1 M LIFT treated electrodes) both obtained using 10 mM [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3− in 0.4 M KCl.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the possible reason for this selectively increased electroactivity, the electroactive area of the untreated and LIFT treated Pt electrodes, respectively, has been determined by studying the electroactivity of the [Fe(CN) 6 ] 4− /[Fe(CN) 6 ] 3− redox couple. The electroactive area measurements, were estimated according to Randles–Sevcik equation (Equation (1)) by CV experiments at scan rate between 0.005 and 0.5 V s −1 in 10 mM [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3− in 0.4 M KCl: Ip = (2.69 × 10 5 )n 3/2 AD 1/2 C v 1/2 , where Ip is the peak current in amperes, n the number of exchanged electrons ( n = 1 for ferricyanide/ferrocyanide red-ox pair), A the electrode area in cm 2 , D the diffusion coefficient (D = 7.60 × 10 −6 cm 2 s −1 for ferricyanide 10 mM in KCl 0.4 M [26]), C the concentration in mol cm −3 and v the sweep rate in V s −1 [27]. Surprisingly, the measured electroactive areas were found similar (8.1 × 10 −2 cm 2 for the untreated and 6.4 × 10 −2 cm 2 for the phosphate buffer 0.1 M LIFT treated electrodes) both obtained using 10 mM [Fe(CN) 6 ] 3− in 0.4 M KCl.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, graphite or N-doped graphite powder (0.94 g) was added, and the mixture was sonicated for an additional 40 min. SPCE and N-SPCE working electrodes were manually printed onto plastic cellulose acetate sheets using a 110-mesh screen prepared as previously described [37].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, the two-solution dip method is more than 5 times more efficient than a similar synthetic path to deposit PB on porous alumina [74]. The PBNP@ treated PGs and PBNP@treated graphite rods have comparable electrochemistry to PB on Pt [72] or Au [75,76], making the PBNP@treated graphites cheap and commercially feasible alternatives to these other expensive ones. These findings are important to sensing, ion selectivity for [83] capture/release systems, energy storage and conversion systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%