2006
DOI: 10.1177/0885066605285024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Recombinant Activated Factor VII (Novoseven) in Trauma and Surgery: Analysis of Outcomes Reported to an International Registry

Abstract: The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of recombinant activated factor VII in patients with massive bleeding. Forty-five patients with severe massive hemorrhage requiring>or= 14 transfusion units of packed red blood cells received recombinant activated factor VII. Postdrug blood loss and transfusion requirements were assessed, and mortality was compared with predicted outcomes. Blood loss was markedly reduced in 40 of 43 (93.0%) patients, and transfusion requirements decreased after recombinant … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
7

Year Published

2006
2006
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
18
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, after repeated off-label experience it is very common for academic physicians to analyze and publish their findings as "new clinical studies" in the form of anecdotal uncontrolled results, small case series, or clinical reviews. Numerous examples of this pattern of reporting are seen with rFVIIa (reviewed in reference 3) including the report in this issue of the Journal of Intensive Care Medicine [4]. Small case series seeking to demonstrate early promising effects may then be used as "evidence" for the legitimacy of repeated and continuing off-label use, even though the rate of adverse events from off-label rFVIIa use is noteworthy [5].…”
Section: Scientific Shortcomings Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, after repeated off-label experience it is very common for academic physicians to analyze and publish their findings as "new clinical studies" in the form of anecdotal uncontrolled results, small case series, or clinical reviews. Numerous examples of this pattern of reporting are seen with rFVIIa (reviewed in reference 3) including the report in this issue of the Journal of Intensive Care Medicine [4]. Small case series seeking to demonstrate early promising effects may then be used as "evidence" for the legitimacy of repeated and continuing off-label use, even though the rate of adverse events from off-label rFVIIa use is noteworthy [5].…”
Section: Scientific Shortcomings Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early control of bleeding and correction of the complications are essential to achieve a better patient outcome. As a haemostatic agent, rFVIIa is widely used to manage massive haemorrhage in non-haemophiliac patients as an off-label use [16][17][18][19]. Since the action of rFVIIa is limited to the site of tissue injury and tissue factor exposure, administration of rFVIIa is considered to be particularly useful in an obstetric setting where there is often bleeding from a large raw area of exposed tissue [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transfusion requirements of RBC concentrates decreased significantly, and the frequency of massive transfusions as well as the rate of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) compared to placebo were significantly reduced. In open trials on the use of rFVIIa in case of massive bleeding [28,47,63] 71 trauma patients received mean rFVIIa doses of 90-140 µg/kg body weight per patient using an average of 1.6 bolus injections.…”
Section: Off-label Use *mentioning
confidence: 99%