2004
DOI: 10.3327/jnst.41.756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Real Options in Nuclear Power Plant Valuation in the Presence of Uncertainty with CO2 Emission Credit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rothwell (2006) finds that returns on investment in nuclear plant need to be higher in a scenario with uncertain carbon prices than in a world with certain prices. Also Laurikka (2004), Laurikka and Koljonen (2006), Kiriyama and Suzuki (2004) deal with the influence of future uncertain emissions trading and with CO 2 penalties within a real options setup. In these models, the design of emissions trading schemes and the number of allowances that are freely distributed are main features of the overall model.…”
Section: Modelling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rothwell (2006) finds that returns on investment in nuclear plant need to be higher in a scenario with uncertain carbon prices than in a world with certain prices. Also Laurikka (2004), Laurikka and Koljonen (2006), Kiriyama and Suzuki (2004) deal with the influence of future uncertain emissions trading and with CO 2 penalties within a real options setup. In these models, the design of emissions trading schemes and the number of allowances that are freely distributed are main features of the overall model.…”
Section: Modelling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rothwell (2006) found that returns on investment in nuclear plant need to be higher in a scenario with uncertain carbon prices than in a world with certain prices. Laurikka (2004) , Laurikka and Klojonen (2006) and Kiriyama and Suzuki (2004) deal with the infl uence of future uncertain emissions trading and with CO 2 penalties within a real options setup. In these models the design of emissions trading schemes and the number of allowances that are freely distributed are main features of the overall model.…”
Section: Evaluating Risk Using Real Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first question arises because carbon price risk is an important factor in investment decision-making by energy companies. Kiriyama and Suzuki (2004) looks at the effects of carbon price and other uncertainties on the value of nuclear power assets and impacts, and shows that risk raises the financial threshold for investment decisions. Reedman et al (2006) and Kettunen et al (2008) look at the effect of uncertainty on the timing of various electricity generation technologies, and found that uptake varied significantly depending on investor's view of the risks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%