2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02631.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of RAPD and killer toxin sensitivity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain typing

Abstract: Aims: Two different strain characterization techniques, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and killer toxin sensitivity (KTS), were compared to assess their typing performance using a set of 30 certified Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Methods and Results: A sequential random resampling procedure was employed to subdivide the 32 descriptors in eight sets, in order to compare the differential performances of the two techniques with diverse number of characters. Results showed that RAPD performs better th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although RAPD PCR analysis is widely used method for discriminating among closely related organisms, Saccharomyces boulardii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae could not be differentiated through this technique as reported by Molnar et al (1995). With a few exceptions, most of the strains were able to cluster together in the dendrogram, according to their geographical origin, which strengthened the fact that RAPD variation is somehow related to geographical origin of the strains as reported by earlier workers in case of cactophilic yeasts (Ganter and Quarles 1997), pathogenic yeasts (Cardinali et al 2002) and brewing yeasts (Corte et al 2005). Majority of yeast isolates i.e.…”
Section: Genetic Variability Revealed By Combined Analysis For Differsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Although RAPD PCR analysis is widely used method for discriminating among closely related organisms, Saccharomyces boulardii and Saccharomyces cerevisiae could not be differentiated through this technique as reported by Molnar et al (1995). With a few exceptions, most of the strains were able to cluster together in the dendrogram, according to their geographical origin, which strengthened the fact that RAPD variation is somehow related to geographical origin of the strains as reported by earlier workers in case of cactophilic yeasts (Ganter and Quarles 1997), pathogenic yeasts (Cardinali et al 2002) and brewing yeasts (Corte et al 2005). Majority of yeast isolates i.e.…”
Section: Genetic Variability Revealed By Combined Analysis For Differsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…RAPD analysis. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis was carried out by using the R3 primer (5=-ATG CAG CCA C-3=), as described previously (29,37), using the following PCR protocol: 4 min at 94°C, 35 cycles of 25 s at 94°C, 30 s at 42°C, and 1.30 min at 72°C, followed by a final cycle of 5 min at 72°C and subsequent cooling to RT (see Fig. S1).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the interdelta analysis, primers delta12 (5=-TCAACA ATGGAATCCCAAC-3=) and delta21 (5=-CATCTTAACACCGTATATG A-3=) and the temperature profile described in Legras and Karst (14) were used. For RAPD-R3, primer R3 (5=-ATGCAGCCAC-3=) was used, with the temperature profile described in Corte et al (15). The PCR products were visualized using QIAxcel Advanced Systems (Qiagen, Venlo, Netherlands).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%