1986
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.55.6.535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of radionuclide angiography and an electrocardiographic stress test to diagnose multivessel disease after a first episode of uncomplicated myocardial infarction.

Abstract: SUMMARY Sixty consecutive patients who were symptom free 2-12 months after an uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction underwent maximal treadmill exercise testing, radionuclide angiography before and during submaximal bicycle stress test, and coronary angiography. The results of the non-invasive procedures were compared with those of coronary angiography. The sensitivity and specificity of electrocardiogram stress test for detection of multivessel disease were 40% and 77% respectively. Failure of left ventri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1987
1987
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A positive exercise test was defined as the development of (a) angina pectoris; (b) horizontal or downsloping ST depression > 1 mm, 80 ms after the J point; (c) an inappropriate blood pressure response defined as failure of the systolic blood pressure to rise 10 mm Hg or more, or, having risen, to fall again by 10 mm Hg or more (the latter finding had to be confirmed immediately the patient stopped exercising); (d) inability to complete the exercise test because of severe dyspnoea, fatigue, or ataxia; (e) increase in the frequency of ventricular extrasystoles of >6 greater than the count on the pre-exercise 379 electrocardiogram or development of ventricular triplets. GROUP UNDERGOING CARDIAC CATHETERISATION (GROUP 3) Cardiac catheterisation was performed at a median of 21 (interquartile range, [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] days after infarction in patients with a positive exercise test. One hundred and thirty nine patients (53% of group 2) were defined as having a positive exercise test but 16 of these patients did not undergo catheterisation for the following reasons: (a) four died before cardiac catheterisation; (b) five refused cardiac catheterisation; (c) four had exercise tests erroneously reported as "negative" (in each case an inappropriate blood pressure response had been overlooked) and were not therefore put forward for catheterisation; (d) three because of administrative error.…”
Section: Exclusion Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A positive exercise test was defined as the development of (a) angina pectoris; (b) horizontal or downsloping ST depression > 1 mm, 80 ms after the J point; (c) an inappropriate blood pressure response defined as failure of the systolic blood pressure to rise 10 mm Hg or more, or, having risen, to fall again by 10 mm Hg or more (the latter finding had to be confirmed immediately the patient stopped exercising); (d) inability to complete the exercise test because of severe dyspnoea, fatigue, or ataxia; (e) increase in the frequency of ventricular extrasystoles of >6 greater than the count on the pre-exercise 379 electrocardiogram or development of ventricular triplets. GROUP UNDERGOING CARDIAC CATHETERISATION (GROUP 3) Cardiac catheterisation was performed at a median of 21 (interquartile range, [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] days after infarction in patients with a positive exercise test. One hundred and thirty nine patients (53% of group 2) were defined as having a positive exercise test but 16 of these patients did not undergo catheterisation for the following reasons: (a) four died before cardiac catheterisation; (b) five refused cardiac catheterisation; (c) four had exercise tests erroneously reported as "negative" (in each case an inappropriate blood pressure response had been overlooked) and were not therefore put forward for catheterisation; (d) three because of administrative error.…”
Section: Exclusion Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%