1996
DOI: 10.1049/ip-map:19960233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of quiet zone prediction in the design of compact antenna test ranges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These plots show that when the ratio of the diameter of the optimized zone to that of reflector is 0.5, the maximum ripple of magnitude along the axis x is 0.3 dB, and the maximum ripple of phase along the axis x is 3.2 • . The ripples are less than those in the definition of quiet zone: ±0.5 dB in magnitude and ±5 • in phase [17]. When the feed is in the focal point, the ripples of the magnitude and phase are 5.6 dB and 28.9 • , respectively.…”
Section: Calculation Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 72%
“…These plots show that when the ratio of the diameter of the optimized zone to that of reflector is 0.5, the maximum ripple of magnitude along the axis x is 0.3 dB, and the maximum ripple of phase along the axis x is 3.2 • . The ripples are less than those in the definition of quiet zone: ±0.5 dB in magnitude and ±5 • in phase [17]. When the feed is in the focal point, the ripples of the magnitude and phase are 5.6 dB and 28.9 • , respectively.…”
Section: Calculation Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Note that the wave impedances of the antenna at shorter distances are generally significantly different from those at the far‐field value of η0=377Ω due to the stronger characteristics of the electric or magnetic field depending on the source type [Micronix, ]. The PD decrease in Table is unavoidable even if we adopt the quiet zone uniformity of the compact range chamber [Parini and Philippakis, ] for exposure. It can be seen that the PD around h = 180 mm is twice the electromagnetic field (EMF) guideline limit of 1 mW/cm 2 [ICNIRP, ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the CR performance, especially the performance of the co-polarization field, the most direct way is to compare its spatial amplitude and phase variations in the transverse plane of the quiet zone [8], [9]. Based on the differences of the generation mechanism, the amplitude or phase variation can further classified as the taper and the ripple [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different from previous papers, in which physical optics (PO) [8], [14], geometrical optics (GO) and geometrical theory of diffraction (GTD) [4], [7], [15] are generally used to for the near-field computation, in this paper, the aperture field convolution method will be adopted. It is based on a convolution algorithm and has the advantages of time-saving and high efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%