Use of Qualitative Methods to Enhance Content Validity

Tilden, Virginia P.; Nelson, Christine A.; May, Barbara A.

doi:10.1097/00006199-199005000-00015

Cited by 168 publications

(175 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

127

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The psychometric properties of its adapted versions were evaluated in several occupational groups [22,23,24,25,26,55,56]. In the adaptation process the investigators of this study followed internationally recommended guidelines during instrument content adaptation: a wide literature review, the development and adaptation of the items, revision by an expert committee, and a pretest [38,39,40].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This analysis was performed by dividing the number of SMSs who agreed by the total number of committee members. Items were considered adequate and no modifications were made when the agreement score was 90% [39,40]. The SMSs made suggestions for the items that did not fulfill the established agreement level.…”

Section: Adaptation Process Of the Jfq For Physical Therapistsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Validity and Reliability of a Job Factors Questionnaire Related to the Work Tasks of Physical Therapists

Shimabukuro¹,

Alexandre²,

Coluci³

et al. 2012

International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Adaptation Process Of the Jfq For Physical Therapistsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validity and Reliability of a Job Factors Questionnaire Related to the Work Tasks of Physical Therapists

Shimabukuro¹,

Alexandre²,

Coluci³

et al. 2012

International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The step in developing the questionnaire is based on international literature, stages of item selection, domain constructions and psychometric properties [6][7][8][9]. The committee of bilingual subject's matter experts (SMEs) [6] can be employed to determine the percentage of agreement score calculated for each questionnaire item [10]. Method of principal components analysis (PCA) is used to identify the items loaded in developing the questionnaire [11].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Review on Item Selection for Development of the Self-Reported Questionnaire Related to Lower Back Disorders at Workplace

Jaffar

Rahman

2017

MATEC Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. This paper reviewed the current method in item selection available for developing self-reported questionnaire related to low back disorders at workplace. A systematic review of the literature was performed by searching using database and the searching strategy employed combined keyword for self-reported questionnaire, item selection, back disorders, and selection of items. Fourteen self-reported questionnaires related to low back disorders were review, there are different techniques implemented in selection of item in developing questionnaire. There are various techniques in selecting items in developing the questionnaire such as by surveying, correlation of item, factor analysis and by means of expert. Most of the self-reported questionnaire selected the items by survey technique based on risk factors related, where the previous self-reported questionnaires were reviewed and taken based on daily activities related to low back disorders. Thus, from the paper reviewed surveying technique were mostly used in selecting the item for the development self-reported technique with eight out of fourteen questionnaires. There are three self-reported questionnaires used in factor analysis to select the item and two self-reported questionnaires use item correlation technique to select the item for development of questionnaire. Only one self-reported questionnaire makes use of expert for selecting item in questionnaire development.

show abstract

“…Percentage (19)(20) , using the focal groups (21) technique to achieve consensus. The original questionnaire and all translations and back translations were provided, as well as the corresponding reports (explanation of the rationale used in each decision).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All had access to copies during the committee's meetings and instructions to analyze for equivalence; the copies were also projected during the meetings (15) . A minimum Content Validity percentage of 90% was adopted among the experts in the event total consensus was not achieved (19)(20) . Because the instrument combines many ways of approaching the interviewee, adjustments were considered in questions that were difficult to comprehend, observed in at least 15% of the participants (22) , and also in difficulties found by the interviewers to apply tests, maneuvers, and the physical assessment.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Cross-cultural adaptation of the Work Disability Diagnosis Interview (WoDDI) for the Brazilian context

Mininel

Felli

Loisel

et al. 2012

Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Work Disability Diagnosis Interview (WoDDI) is a structured interview guide developed by the University of Sherbrooke, Canada to help clinicians detect the most important workrelated disability predictors and to identify one or more causes of prolonged absenteeism. This methodological study aims for the cross-cultural adaptation of the WoDDI for the Brazilian context. The method followed international guidelines for studies of this kind, including the following steps: initial translation, synthesis of translations, back translation, evaluation by an expert committee and testing of the penultimate version. These steps allowed obtaining conceptual, semantic, idiomatic, experiential and operational equivalences, in addition to content validity. The results showed that the translated WoDDI is adapted to the Brazilian context and can be used after training. Adaptación transcultural del Work Disability Diagnosis Interview (WoDDI) para el contexto brasileñoEl Work Disability Diagnosis Interview (WoDDI) es una guía de entrevista estructurada desarrollada por la Universidad de Sherbrooke (Canadá), para ayudar a los profesionales de la salud a detectar los predictores de mayor importancia para personas con trastornos relacionados con el trabajo y para identificar una o más causas de ausentismo prolongado del trabajo. Este estudio metodológico se dirige a la adaptación transcultural (WoDDI) para el contexto brasileño. El método siguió las recomendaciones internacionales para este tipo de estudio, el que comprende las siguientes etapas: traducción inicial, síntesis de las traducciones, retraducción, revisión del comité de expertos y prueba de la versión pre-final. Estas medidas permitieron obtener la equivalencia conceptual, semántica, idiomática y la experiencia operacional, además de la validación del contenido. Los resultados mostraron que el WoDDI traducido se adapta a la realidad brasileña e puede ser utilizado, después de la capacitación previa.

show abstract

Use of Qualitative Methods to Enhance Content Validity

Cited by 168 publications

References 0 publications

Validity and Reliability of a Job Factors Questionnaire Related to the Work Tasks of Physical Therapists

Validity and Reliability of a Job Factors Questionnaire Related to the Work Tasks of Physical Therapists

Review on Item Selection for Development of the Self-Reported Questionnaire Related to Lower Back Disorders at Workplace

Cross-cultural adaptation of the Work Disability Diagnosis Interview (WoDDI) for the Brazilian context

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About