2001
DOI: 10.4133/jeeg6.4.175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Principal Component Analysis to Determine Down-hole Tool Orientation and Enhance SH-Waves

Abstract: A common problem in down-hole shear wave surveys is the determination of the tool rotation relative to the seismic source polarization direction. This paper reports an algorithm which has been developed to solve for this angle in the horizontal plane. The method employs Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to determine the angle from the large motion of the SH-wave (not first motion). Once the angle is known, the horizontal component data may be rotated so that one component is aligned with the source polarizati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The drive casing was not removed easily and the considerable jerking and vibration during drive casing removal with the oversize drive shoe undoubtedly contributed to formation collapse as well. Also, geophysical testing for vertical seismic profiles of each well using a geophone pressed against the inner borehole wall with a bowspring indicated good mechanical coupling to the formation through the well screen (Michaels, 1998;2001) and generated complete profiles without intervals of ringing or highly attenuated and noisy signals that would indicate zones of poor collapse (Dr P. Michaels, 2001, personal commun.). Also, the vast majority of the aquifer is cobbles and sand (Barrash and Reboulet, 2004) with framework cobbles which are not likely to compact and cause significant decrease in K in the same sense as more 'pliable' sands or finer-grained sediments might.…”
Section: Possible Compaction Of the Formation During Well Drilling Anmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The drive casing was not removed easily and the considerable jerking and vibration during drive casing removal with the oversize drive shoe undoubtedly contributed to formation collapse as well. Also, geophysical testing for vertical seismic profiles of each well using a geophone pressed against the inner borehole wall with a bowspring indicated good mechanical coupling to the formation through the well screen (Michaels, 1998;2001) and generated complete profiles without intervals of ringing or highly attenuated and noisy signals that would indicate zones of poor collapse (Dr P. Michaels, 2001, personal commun.). Also, the vast majority of the aquifer is cobbles and sand (Barrash and Reboulet, 2004) with framework cobbles which are not likely to compact and cause significant decrease in K in the same sense as more 'pliable' sands or finer-grained sediments might.…”
Section: Possible Compaction Of the Formation During Well Drilling Anmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A core, drive, and drill technique was used to construct the wells at the BHRS with minimal disturbance of the formation including natural collapse of the formation against the well screen after removal of the drive casing (e.g., Morin et al 1988). Collapse of the formation against the polyvinyl chloride (PVC) screen was anticipated, then confirmed with vertical seismic profiling (Michaels 1998, 2001). The potential for small regions of incomplete collapse makes bypass flow around blockage of the borehole by a packer or skirt an issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The down-hole geophone was a BH-2 3-component sidewall clamping geophone (Crice 1996). Downhole geophone orientation was done by principle component analysis of horizontal component hodograms (Michaels 2001b).…”
Section: Bore Hole Geophysicsmentioning
confidence: 99%