1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82381-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of portable ultrasound to assist urine collection by suprapubic aspiration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the previous technical report, SPA was reported to have success rates ranging from 23% to 90%, 22-24 although higher success rates have been achieved when SPA is conducted under ultrasonographic guidance. 25,26 SPA is considered more invasive than catheterization and, in RCTs from 2006 27 and 2010, 28 pain scores associated with SPA were significantly higher than those associated with catheterization. This result was found for both boys and girls.…”
Section: Obtaining a Urine Samplementioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the previous technical report, SPA was reported to have success rates ranging from 23% to 90%, 22-24 although higher success rates have been achieved when SPA is conducted under ultrasonographic guidance. 25,26 SPA is considered more invasive than catheterization and, in RCTs from 2006 27 and 2010, 28 pain scores associated with SPA were significantly higher than those associated with catheterization. This result was found for both boys and girls.…”
Section: Obtaining a Urine Samplementioning
confidence: 97%
“…[6][7][8] When ultrasonographic guidance is used, success rates improve. 9,10 The technique has limited risks, but technical expertise and experience are required, and many parents and physicians perceive the procedure as unacceptably invasive, compared with catheterization. However, there may be no acceptable alternative to SPA for boys with moderate or severe phimosis or girls with tight labial adhesions.…”
Section: Diagnosis Action Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of point‐of‐care US in emergency departments (EDs) has increased since the 1980s, with the technique becoming one of the core competencies of emergency medicine (EM) residency training . The literature demonstrates that point‐of‐care US use can decrease costs, reduce the need for additional diagnostic testing, improve patient throughput and the length of stay, increase the success rate of invasive procedures and decrease the rate of complications, improve patient satisfaction, and reduce the need for further imaging with ionizing radiation . The use of US also has the potential to improve safety and efficiency of care in pediatric EDs, as supported by the American College of Emergency Physicians …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%