2018
DOI: 10.1039/c7lc01248a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of porous membranes in tissue barrier and co-culture models

Abstract: Porous membranes enable the partitioning of cellular microenvironments in vitro, while still allowing physical and biochemical crosstalk between cells, a feature that is often necessary for recapitulating physiological functions. This article provides an overview of the different membranes used in tissue barrier and cellular co-culture models with a focus on experimental design and control of these systems. Specifically, we discuss how the structural, mechanical, chemical, and even the optical and transport pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
134
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
(164 reference statements)
0
134
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[6] Literature indicates that porous membranes are an essential component for compartmentalized cell co-cultures and to support a tissue barrier. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] However, most barrier models incorporate commercially available track-etched membranes such as those found in transwell, fiber-based, or micro-fluidic systems with a high thickness compared to the basal laminae in vivo (>10 µm vs. ~300 nm). By using available materials, the porosity cannot be adequately engineered, leading to low porosity, random pore distribution, and limited size control, potentially biasing physiological multi-cellular interplay, especially during co-culture conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6] Literature indicates that porous membranes are an essential component for compartmentalized cell co-cultures and to support a tissue barrier. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] However, most barrier models incorporate commercially available track-etched membranes such as those found in transwell, fiber-based, or micro-fluidic systems with a high thickness compared to the basal laminae in vivo (>10 µm vs. ~300 nm). By using available materials, the porosity cannot be adequately engineered, leading to low porosity, random pore distribution, and limited size control, potentially biasing physiological multi-cellular interplay, especially during co-culture conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of these membranes is not trivial given the fact that in filtration devices designed for nanoscale species the small pores inherently increase the fluid resistance across the membrane. 34 High permeability, at the nanoscale, can be obtained through membranes with a pore size to thickness ratio close to one. 34,35 Such platform should provide ultrathin membranes with close control on pore size over the range of small EVs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 High permeability, at the nanoscale, can be obtained through membranes with a pore size to thickness ratio close to one. 34,35 Such platform should provide ultrathin membranes with close control on pore size over the range of small EVs. Another reason for minimal thickness is to improve tissue barrier function in a direct co-culture format by allowing physical contact and fast exchange of soluble factors, [36][37][38] establishing a more physiologically relevant model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This advantage may be of particular value to large area nanoporous membranes with precisely engineered pore properties that would otherwise be altered and compromised by a conformal polymer coating. 33,[35][36][37][38][39][40] Our aim is to provide a straightforward methodology for the indirect patterning of SAMs at the nanoscale.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%