2000
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.38.7.2550-2556.2000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Pooled Fecal Culture for Sensitive and Economic Detection ofMycobacterium aviumsubsp.paratuberculosisInfection in Flocks of Sheep

Abstract: Ovine Johne's disease, or paratuberculosis, occurs in many countries. In Australia, surveillance using serology is used as part of a control program, but the testing regime is costly relative to its sensitivity. For this reason, culturing of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in fecal samples pooled from a number of sheep was evaluated. Initially, the effect of pooling on the sensitivity of fecal culture was evaluated using samples from 20 sheep with multibacillary paratuberculosis and 20 sheep with p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
10

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
56
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…1 pellet per sheep), and gloves were changed between pools. The pools were cultured using a modified BACTEC radiometric method 6 and were considered positive if there was growth in the culture that tested positive for IS900 by polymerase chain reaction and restriction endonuclease analysis. 7 The prevalence of sheep shedding Mptb within each flock/sex cohort was estimated using the on-line pooled prevalence calculator.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 pellet per sheep), and gloves were changed between pools. The pools were cultured using a modified BACTEC radiometric method 6 and were considered positive if there was growth in the culture that tested positive for IS900 by polymerase chain reaction and restriction endonuclease analysis. 7 The prevalence of sheep shedding Mptb within each flock/sex cohort was estimated using the on-line pooled prevalence calculator.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Using this culture method, testing fecal samples in pools of 50 sheep provided 95% confidence of detecting 2% prevalence in the flock, and was more sensitive than ELISA for identifying infected flocks. 25 Testing by PCR is more sensitive than culture of individual fecal samples from experimentally infected sheep. 26 In goats, culture for MAP also has been shown to have low sensitivity, 23 thus the recommended organism detection method for fecal samples is PCR.…”
Section: Diagnostic Test Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Culture is similar to serological testing in its ability to detect infected animals, although it was considered the reference standard for testing. Faecal culture enhanced by PCR testing has improved diagnostic sensitivity and is now the new reference standard (Whittington et al, 2000;Marsh and Whittington, 2001).…”
Section: Faecesmentioning
confidence: 99%