2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.02.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Polidocanol Endovenous Microfoam to Improve Hemodynamics and Symptomology in Patients with Challenging Clinical Presentations: A Case Series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The full-text reading and application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in the inclusion of 16 studies in the present systematic review. We excluded 65 studies for the following reasons (Appendix 2): reviews with overlapping data, 7,8 primary outcome not reported, 918 not written in English, 19–31 conference abstracts, 32–55 overlapping data with an already included report by same author, 56 data not yet available, 57 full text not available, 58 no distinction between primary and secondary AASV incompetence, 59 no distinction in outcome between GSV and AASV, 6062 and other outcome. 6371 A flow chart of the selection procedure is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full-text reading and application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in the inclusion of 16 studies in the present systematic review. We excluded 65 studies for the following reasons (Appendix 2): reviews with overlapping data, 7,8 primary outcome not reported, 918 not written in English, 19–31 conference abstracts, 32–55 overlapping data with an already included report by same author, 56 data not yet available, 57 full text not available, 58 no distinction between primary and secondary AASV incompetence, 59 no distinction in outcome between GSV and AASV, 6062 and other outcome. 6371 A flow chart of the selection procedure is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Review ние), которые значимо влияют на качество жизни и приводят к потере работоспособности [6][7][8].…”
Section: обзорunclassified
“…To date, several pivotal clinical trials have been published regarding PEM, its safety profile, and its impact on improving patient symptoms and appearance. [4][5][6][7]13,14 However, in these studies, the closure rate was not included as an outcome measure. As a result, it was difficult to compare the published efficacy outcomes of PEM with traditional measures of venous occlusion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%