2001
DOI: 10.3109/14417040109003718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Phonological Processes in Australian Children Ages 2 to 7;11 Years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that glottal stop replacement affects a much wider class of consonants than just fricatives and affricates (Grunwell, 1981b;James, 2001;Smit, 1993a), we see no viable justification for classifying the replacement of fricatives and affricates by glottal stops as stopping.…”
Section: Stopping Of Fricatives and Affricatesmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Given that glottal stop replacement affects a much wider class of consonants than just fricatives and affricates (Grunwell, 1981b;James, 2001;Smit, 1993a), we see no viable justification for classifying the replacement of fricatives and affricates by glottal stops as stopping.…”
Section: Stopping Of Fricatives and Affricatesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, this recommendation could be criticized on the grounds that it does not provide a complete picture of a child's phonological system. Research shows that error patterns in the speech of older children are more likely to show up in words consisting of three or more syllables than in shorter words (e.g., James, 2001;James, van Doorn, & McLeod, 2008). Therefore, limiting the phonotactic shape of the test items included in these types of tests may fail to capture the subtleties of the speech of school-age children.…”
Section: Study Limitations and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It would be expected that the children's polysyllable productions would be less accurate given that children with typically developing speech and language demonstrate systemic (segmental) and structural phonological processes in polysyllables well beyond the ages previously reported based on mono-and disyllabic word stimuli (James, Ferguson & Butcher, 2016). In addition, it has been reported that children with typically developing speech and language demonstrate lower consonant and vowel accuracy when saying polysyllables compared with monosyllabic and disyllabic words (James, 2001;Vance, Stackhouse & Wells, 2005). Sampling tasks aside, consideration also needs to be given to how a sample of polysyllables produced by children with phonologically-based SSD could best be analysed.…”
Section: Assessment Of Polysyllabic Wordsmentioning
confidence: 99%