2021
DOI: 10.1097/mph.0000000000002167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Pharmacologic Prophylaxis Against Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Injured Children

Abstract: Despite a practice management guideline and risk prediction model for venous thromboembolism (VTE), pediatric-specific evidence on pharmacologic prophylaxis is lacking. In a retrospective study, we characterized receipt of prophylaxis and explored its effectiveness in hospitalized injured patients below 18 years old using data from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program. Concordance of receipt of prophylaxis with guideline and predicted risk of VTE was estimated using κ statistic. Effectiveness was explored us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 20 Similarly, in 2 studies looking at pharmacologic TP in pediatric trauma patients aged 0 to 18 years, 1.1% and 6.2% of patients were given VTE prophylaxis, respectively. 21 , 22 Our study did include more current data (up to 2021), and the use of TP has likely increased in other pediatric and adolescent populations as well given the increasing recognition of VTE as preventable harm in children’s hospitals. 18 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 20 Similarly, in 2 studies looking at pharmacologic TP in pediatric trauma patients aged 0 to 18 years, 1.1% and 6.2% of patients were given VTE prophylaxis, respectively. 21 , 22 Our study did include more current data (up to 2021), and the use of TP has likely increased in other pediatric and adolescent populations as well given the increasing recognition of VTE as preventable harm in children’s hospitals. 18 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among infants in our study, rates of CADVT generally decreased across periods as the starting dose of enoxaparin was increased. Studies in children suggest that prophylaxis is most effective when started within 3 days after insertion of the CVC (24). Differences in time to start prophylaxis unlikely impacted the rates of CADVT in our study because median times across the 3 periods were within 3 days of insertion of the CVC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among infants in our study, rates of CADVT generally decreased across periods as the starting dose of enoxaparin was increased. Studies in children suggest that prophylaxis is most effective when started within 3 days after insertion of the CVC (24). Differences in time to start prophylaxis , protocol implementation (period 2; January 2016-January 2017), and protocol revision (period 3; February 2017-December 2018).…”
Section: At the Bedsidementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The combined data, which had low certainty of evidence, showed no conclusive effect of LMWH on the rates of CADVT [29 ▪▪ ]. Guidelines exist for DVT prophylaxis in select pediatric populations but likely because of the historic lack of strong evidence, few children actually receive prophylaxis, and those who do are in poor concordance with the guidelines [30 ▪ ].…”
Section: Prevention Of Central Venous Catheter-associated Deep Vein T...mentioning
confidence: 99%