2012
DOI: 10.1617/s11527-012-9834-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of permanent ferrocement forms for concrete beam construction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…U-shaped ferrocement with 98 expanded steel mesh exhibits higher first crack load, ultimate load, and serviceability load when compared with beams reinforced with EX156 expanded steel mesh and then specimens reinforced with woven mesh [18]. e beams with lightweight brick have higher first crack load and ultimate load when compared with conventional beams with welded wire mesh.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…U-shaped ferrocement with 98 expanded steel mesh exhibits higher first crack load, ultimate load, and serviceability load when compared with beams reinforced with EX156 expanded steel mesh and then specimens reinforced with woven mesh [18]. e beams with lightweight brick have higher first crack load and ultimate load when compared with conventional beams with welded wire mesh.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This paper presents a continuation of the investigation reported by Tawab et al (2012). In the present investigation single and double layers of welded wire and X8 expanded steel meshes are used to reinforce the U-shaped forms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Recently Abdel Tawab et al (2012) has presented the results of an experimental investigation to examine the feasibility and effectiveness of using precast U-shaped ferrocement laminates as permanent forms for construction of reinforced concrete beams. The precast permanent ferrocement forms were proposed as a viable alternative to the commonly used wooden and/or steel temporary forms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior researches have demonstrated that using SM as circumferential confinement for RC columns increases the strain value at the failure and the column ductility, and distributes stress regularly. Additionally, SM boosts the capacity of energy absorption and changes the mode of failure from a brittle pattern to a ductile one [14][15][16][17]. Kim and Choi [18] examined a repairing technique for deteriorated RC columns due to the earthquake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%