1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(19990515)35:3<364::aid-prot11>3.0.co;2-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes

Abstract: Empirical residue-residue pair potentials are used to screen possible complexes for protein-protein dockings. A correct docking is defined as a complex with not more than 2.5 A root-mean-square distance from the known experimental structure. The complexes were generated by "ftdock" (Gabb et al. J Mol Biol 1997;272:106-120) that ranks using shape complementarity. The complexes studied were 5 enzyme-inhibitors and 2 antibody-antigens, starting from the unbound crystallographic coordinates, with a further 2 antib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
147
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 244 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(2 reference statements)
4
147
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The residue-pairing score came from associating the residue pairs in the interfacial area with likelihood statistics observed for those pairs in high resolution X-Ray structures. 55 The residue-pairing score compliments well the RDC correlation score as there are multiple minima in the RDC score due to the shape degeneracy of the dimer models The pairing scores ranged from 10.96 for the most favorable pairs to À10.41 for the least favorable. The best dimeric models were selected based on a set of criteria including a Pearson correlation coefficient for RDC comparisons >0.80 and a sum of residue-pairing scores >0.…”
Section: Grid Search Algorithm and Model Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The residue-pairing score came from associating the residue pairs in the interfacial area with likelihood statistics observed for those pairs in high resolution X-Ray structures. 55 The residue-pairing score compliments well the RDC correlation score as there are multiple minima in the RDC score due to the shape degeneracy of the dimer models The pairing scores ranged from 10.96 for the most favorable pairs to À10.41 for the least favorable. The best dimeric models were selected based on a set of criteria including a Pearson correlation coefficient for RDC comparisons >0.80 and a sum of residue-pairing scores >0.…”
Section: Grid Search Algorithm and Model Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, the widely used residue level pair potential score (RPScore) was derived from a statistical analysis of pairwise interactions at complex interfaces and was reported to efficiently select near-native structures from a set of decoys (38). All of the docking solutions generated from the intramolecular and intermolecular databases were scored with the RPScore.…”
Section: Optimization Of Scotch By Using a Statistical Pairwise Potenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bcl-3 ARD structure and the (p50) 2 homodimer were superimposed onto the I B␣⅐NF-B complex. Pirin was then docked to the Bcl-3⅐(p50) 2 complex using the program FTDOCK (40). The surface of Pirin has a large acidic patch on the N-terminal domain surface formed by residues 77-82, 97-103, and 124 -128.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%