2019
DOI: 10.1177/1526602818824682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Paclitaxel-Eluting Technologies in the Femoropopliteal Segment Under Scrutiny Over Possible Link to Late All-Cause Mortality: Time to Panic or an Opportunity to Resurge?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remarkably, Katsanos considered death from all causes as primary safety measure ignoring the relationship between the procedure and the event. 21 These results are in line with other reports. More notably, and importantly for greater use of the therapy, our 1-year patency rates were greater than those reported in most earlier studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Remarkably, Katsanos considered death from all causes as primary safety measure ignoring the relationship between the procedure and the event. 21 These results are in line with other reports. More notably, and importantly for greater use of the therapy, our 1-year patency rates were greater than those reported in most earlier studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, further studies are of course required to better understand the potential risks of these devices. 29 Discussion among specialists and key opinion leaders is still open to fully understand if there is any direct correlation between mortality and the application of intra-arterial paclitaxel in the periphery. The drug dose, the drug formulation, the excipient, and the exposure time are still in debate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, further studies are of course required to better understand the potential risks of these devices. 29…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous arguments put forth [8][9][10][11][12][13][14] to counter the Katsanos meta-analysis 1 for those who simply do not believe or refuse to accept the results, for example, lack of standardization between trial endpoints preventing meaningful data comparison, lack of patient-level outcome, merging of DCB and DES device outcomes, lack of correlation between paclitaxel dose and mortality, and a paucity of longterm follow-up data for most of the included trials (100% at 12 months, 43% at 2 years, and only 10% at 4-5 years). Clearly these RCTs were never designed or powered to look at mortality outcomes in the first instance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%