2002
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-618x.2002.tb00160.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Nursing Diagnoses and Interventions in Public Health Nursing Practice

Abstract: PURPOSE. To determine the frequency of use of NANDA diagnoses and the Nursing Interventions Classification in care plans written by public health nurses (PHNs) in Orange County, CA. METHODS. Retrospective chart review. FINDINGS. The frequency pattern of nursing diagnoses and nursing interventions used in care plans is consistent with the scope of practice of the PHN, whose emphasis is on health promotion and disease prevention. CONCLUSIONS. The most commonly used diagnoses and interventions provide evide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…High frequencies of nursing diagnoses in care plans were reported (Smith‐Higuchi et al. 1999, Rivera & Parris 2002). According to Thoroddsen and Thorsteinsson (2002), 60% of records contained from 1 to 10 nursing diagnoses; however, 65% of these nursing documentations contained three or fewer diagnoses, while altered comfort was the most often‐stated diagnosis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High frequencies of nursing diagnoses in care plans were reported (Smith‐Higuchi et al. 1999, Rivera & Parris 2002). According to Thoroddsen and Thorsteinsson (2002), 60% of records contained from 1 to 10 nursing diagnoses; however, 65% of these nursing documentations contained three or fewer diagnoses, while altered comfort was the most often‐stated diagnosis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the results of this study, follow‐up research will focus on the implementation of NANDA, NIC, and NOC (NNN) in the electronic patient documentation by applying the criteria for the quality of documentation, displayed in Q‐DIO. Such software programs must contain automated linkages between NNN (Brokel & Nicholson, 2006; Rivera & Parris, 2002), the nursing assessment data, and the nursing progress notes. This study supports the use of the Q‐DIO in evaluating documentation of nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different authors have agreed that nurses must be better educated concerning the use of nursing diagnoses, signs, and symptoms, as well as the etiology (Courtens & Huijer Abu‐Saad, 1998; Delaney, Herr, Maas, & Specht, 2000; Delaney & Moorhead, 1997; Ehrenberg & Ehnfors, 1999; Rivera & Parris, 2002). Investigations in Canada reported that nurses had difficulties with making a diagnosis and that 44% of the nursing diagnoses were not based on etiological factors (Smith‐Higuchi et al., 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the results of this study, we recommend application of the criteria for the quality of documentation displayed in Q‐DIO when including nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes in the electronic patient documentation. Such a software program should contain automated linkages between NNN (Rivera & Parris 2002, Brokel & Nicholson 2006), and also with the nursing assessment and nursing progress notes. The Q‐DIO was shown to be useful as an audit tool and is recommended for development as an integrated feature in the electronic health record.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have reported that nurses must be better trained in relation to nursing diagnoses, signs and symptoms as well as their aetiology (Delaney et al. 2000, Rivera & Parris 2002, Lunney 2003). Investigations have shown nurses’ difficulties with making a diagnosis, with 44% of nursing diagnoses not being based on aetiological factors (Smith‐Higuchi et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%