2014 IEEE 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing 2014
DOI: 10.1109/cloud.2014.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Network Latency Profiling and Redundancy for Cloud Server Selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work in [18] and our experiments show that network instabilities (e.g., network congestion due to server workload increment [19], intermediate node dynamic wake-up time scheduling, and/or reprogramming [20,21]) may cause network communications latency to vary over time. CLAS addresses this issue through preprocessing of RTL measurements and using multiple temporal profiling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The work in [18] and our experiments show that network instabilities (e.g., network congestion due to server workload increment [19], intermediate node dynamic wake-up time scheduling, and/or reprogramming [20,21]) may cause network communications latency to vary over time. CLAS addresses this issue through preprocessing of RTL measurements and using multiple temporal profiling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [18], the authors perform extensive experiments to measure network communications latency and conclude that it approximately follows a Gaussian distribution with the mean and standard deviation used to characterize different cloud servers. We partially leverage this observation to develop our authentication scheme.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results for application classification using supervised learning [37] report F1 scores up to 0.98. There has also been work [21] on QoS profiling using linear models for the purposes of predicting bulk data transfer latency between data centres via an ISP backbone, with error rates up to 3%. Our work goes beyond the state of the art on IP traffic classification of application type and looks at the more difficult task of classifying periods of application packet loss and latency, ultimately providing an indirect way to quantify the severity of these periods.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This network should have transparent platform for reliable delivery of services to distributed users and applications. Thus we are presenting a flow chart of distributed service broker policy (DSBP) algorithm in which discrete recourses are allocated for applications rather than completely isolated systems [12].…”
Section: Network Latency Profiling and Redundancymentioning
confidence: 99%