2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11596-020-2235-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Muscle Feeding Arteries as Recipient Vessels for Soft Tissue Reconstruction in Lower Extremities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While alternative pedicle sources such as muscle-feeding arteries 8 , genicular vessels 9,10 , and medial sural vessels 11 have been described in various small series, our surgical group continues to prefer use of the PT or AT/DP systems, if available. This has been further promoted by Hong et al (2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While alternative pedicle sources such as muscle-feeding arteries 8 , genicular vessels 9,10 , and medial sural vessels 11 have been described in various small series, our surgical group continues to prefer use of the PT or AT/DP systems, if available. This has been further promoted by Hong et al (2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recipient vessel choice is a critical decision in microsurgery overall, and decision-making in vessel selection has been suggested to improve with experience and volume. 8 While alternative pedicle sources such as muscle-feeding arteries, 9 genicular vessels, 10 11 and medial sural vessels 12 have been described in various small series, our surgical group continues to prefer the use of the PT or AT/DP systems, if available. This has been further promoted by Hong et al 13 Although we could not directly assess the location of anastomosis in this study, the location of the point of anastomosis, whether proximal or distal to the wound, also bears consideration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%