2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2010.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of multiple colorimetric indicators for paper-based microfluidic devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
223
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 319 publications
(228 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
4
223
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Detection has mainly been carried out using colorimetric assays for off-site analysis via the ubiquitous smartphone [9,10]; however, electrochemical detection has also been investigated [11,12]. Several reviews are available [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detection has mainly been carried out using colorimetric assays for off-site analysis via the ubiquitous smartphone [9,10]; however, electrochemical detection has also been investigated [11,12]. Several reviews are available [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LOD of our nitrite assay was similar to the LOD of PADs (LOD = 0.005 mM) and 5.6 times lower than the LOD of poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS)-based analytical devices (LOD = 0.045 mM) [25,26]. The LOD of our glucose assay was compatible for the current criteria of urine glucose, was better than the LOD of PADs (which could only recognize glucose levels above 0.5 mM), and was 7 times lower than the LOD of PDMS-based analytical devices (LOD = 0.56 mM) [27,28]. We thus believe that integrating color contrast into our platform design significantly improves the LODs of colorimetric assays and readily facilitates identification of results via the naked eye.…”
Section: Nitrite and Glucose Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] A number of μPAD fabrication methods have been developed to define hydrophilic microchannels on μPADs, including photolithography, 6,7 plasma-etching, 8 wax-printing, [9][10][11] plotting, 12 screen-printing, 13,14 contact stamping, [15][16][17] cutting, [18][19][20] and laminating, 21,22 among others. Each fabrication method has its own advantages and limitations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%