Use of multiperspective qualitative interviews to understand patients' and carers' beliefs, experiences, and needs

Abstract

Use of multiperspective qualitative interviews to understand patients' and carers' beliefs, experiences, and needs | The BMJ http://www.bmj.com/content/339/bmj.b4122.full.print 1/7This site uses cookies. More info Close By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

Social, psychological and existential well-being in patients with glioma and their caregivers: a qualitative study

“…Serial, multiperspective interviews enabled us to track and compare changes in perceived problems as patients approached death, and to compare needs at various key times in this trajectory. 10,11 However, although qualitative data pro vide rich and useful insights to the issues we studied, an added quantitative measure of distress and adjustment would have allowed us to compare our study group with the wider population.…”

“…10,11 We conducted all interviews over a period of two years. Serial interviews were done with patients and their relatives up to five times over a period of 9-18 months: time 1, before pathological diagnosis; time 2, after diagnosis and immediately preceding treatment with chemotherapy or radio therapy; time 3, after treatment ended; time 4, at six months' follow-up; and time 5, postbereavement.…”

‘Because it kind of falls in between, doesn’t it? Like an acute thing and a chronic’: The psychological experience of anaphylaxis in adulthood

“…A qualitative multi-perspective interview design was adopted, as this approach is particularly useful for generating rich data to understand experience and needs (Kendall et al, 2009). Recruitment took place via a specialist allergy clinic in a National…”

“…Research has also not explored the perspective of individuals providing support, for example, family members and healthcare staff. Exploring adult-onset anaphylaxis from these different perspectives would enhance our understanding of the psychological experience of this condition, and potentially generate practical recommendations for service improvement (Kendall et al, 2009). Furthermore, qualitative research may be more appropriate in exploring novel or under-researched areas as there is an increased emphasis on inductively, rather than deductively, derived experiences.…”

Shared recovery: Couples' experiences after treatment for colorectal cancer

“…Firstly, by adopting a multi-perspective qualitative methodology (Kendall et al, 2009), the study aimed to provide a more detailed analysis of patient-caregiver dyads, a gap identified in recent research (Fletcher et al, 2012;Hagedoorn et al, 2011;Mellon et al, 2006Mellon et al, , 2007Waldron et al, 2012). Secondly, it included both cancer patients and their caregivers after completion of treatment, a key transition period (Mellon et al, 2006;Murray et al, 2010).…”