2005
DOI: 10.1002/sia.2113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Monte Carlo models in the development and validation of CD operators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…about 10 nm for a probe diameter of 10 nm. Thus for the case of steep edges, a correction of the exponential top CD edge operator is required and was already published [16,17]. The trends in CD variation due to variation of model parameters which are presented here are confirmed by other Monte Carlo investigations for silicon structures and bottom CD evaluation [18].…”
Section: Top CD Uncertainty Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…about 10 nm for a probe diameter of 10 nm. Thus for the case of steep edges, a correction of the exponential top CD edge operator is required and was already published [16,17]. The trends in CD variation due to variation of model parameters which are presented here are confirmed by other Monte Carlo investigations for silicon structures and bottom CD evaluation [18].…”
Section: Top CD Uncertainty Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…When the electron beam is injected onto the sidewall of the specimen, the detected signal of the inner boundary has exponential distribution. 5 Although the peak of the signals broadens into a plateau and drops at slower speed as the angle of the sidewall decreases, it is evident that the intensity maximum occurs at the upper sidewall regardless of the angle of sidewall 6 (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Critical Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In the whole interaction volume, secondary electrons (SE) are generated. Monte Carlo simulations show that the lateral distribution of SE generation within the interaction volume can be well described by an exponential distribution, at least in low-voltage SEM [4]. Due to their low energy (typically 3-5 eV), only SE from a thin surface layer of a few nanometer can escape to vacuum.…”
Section: Sem Image Formation and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The choice of exponential functions is motivated by the lateral exponential distribution of the image intensity around the impinging electron beam in an SEM [4]. The model equation …”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%