2012
DOI: 10.1111/pbr.12025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of molecular marker diversity to increase forage yield in timothy (Phleum pratense L.)

Abstract: 1The aim of this study was to investigate genetic distances (GDs) based on molecular 2 markers in relation to forage yield improvement in timothy syn1 and polycross progenies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(84 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yield superiority of HMD group progeny over the LMD group progeny (69.60%) and control (48.10%) at drought stress conditions is a promising indication deserving close attention in the breeding programmes. The presence of significantly increased forage yield in Syn1 progeny from parents selected for HMD is in agreement to findings in perennial ryegrass, tall fescue and timothy (Amini et al, ; Ghesquiere et al, ; Kolliker et al, ; Tanaka et al, , ). Since yield stability is one of the main breeding objectives in breeding for stress environments (Einfeldt, Ceccarelli, Grando, Gland‐Zwerger, & Geiger, ), higher values of STI and YSI in HMD group progeny compare to LMD group progeny and the control is quite remarkable and implies that HMD group progeny had greater buffering capacity against reduction in yield under drought stress.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Yield superiority of HMD group progeny over the LMD group progeny (69.60%) and control (48.10%) at drought stress conditions is a promising indication deserving close attention in the breeding programmes. The presence of significantly increased forage yield in Syn1 progeny from parents selected for HMD is in agreement to findings in perennial ryegrass, tall fescue and timothy (Amini et al, ; Ghesquiere et al, ; Kolliker et al, ; Tanaka et al, , ). Since yield stability is one of the main breeding objectives in breeding for stress environments (Einfeldt, Ceccarelli, Grando, Gland‐Zwerger, & Geiger, ), higher values of STI and YSI in HMD group progeny compare to LMD group progeny and the control is quite remarkable and implies that HMD group progeny had greater buffering capacity against reduction in yield under drought stress.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In other words, heterosis probably exists due to different allelic combinations at particular loci in each parent which when brought together in hybrid combination, complement each other, resulting in heterosis expression. Moreover, progeny are able to produce diverse allelic products which increase the overall performance (Geleta, Labuschagne, & Viljoen, 2004;Pandey et al, 2015;Tanaka et al, 2013). Lower fitness of progeny from parents with LMD was F I G U R E 2 Cluster analysis of four polycross groups with contrasting levels of diversity under normal irrigation (a) and drought stress conditions (b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another reason for unbalanced selection may be that only progeny plants derived from a particular parental combination tend to be selected due to affinity between maternal and paternal parents exhibiting specific combining ability and/or inbreeding depression. The significant correlation between yield performance of polycross progenies and marker‐based genetic distances shown in a previous study using Polycross D (Tanaka et al, 2013) supports this as a cause of unbalanced paternal selection in Polycross D. However, this cannot apply to Polycross B (data not shown). Unequal polycross mating may also cause unbalanced frequency of paternal parents in a polycross population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…II (Table 2) was described in a previous study (Exp. 2 in Tanaka et al, 2013). Briefly, cumulated DMYs (Mg ha −1 ) of 41 progenies from Polycross D, together with check cultivars (‘Nosappu’, ‘Aurora’, and ‘Hokusei’) as comparative controls, were evaluated over 2 yr (2002–2003) at the KAES.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%