1956
DOI: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1956.tb16674.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Molecular Filter Membranes for Water Potability Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1957
1957
1977
1977

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameters of the lognormal distribution are the mean log estimated by log x log xi (6) and the variance of the logs estimated as var log x = n-1 2 (log x,. -log x)2 (7) Coliform counts of zero present a problem with the use of the lognormal distribution. One solution is to use the lognormal distribution with added zeros (sometimes called the delta distribution).…”
Section: Distributions Consideredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters of the lognormal distribution are the mean log estimated by log x log xi (6) and the variance of the logs estimated as var log x = n-1 2 (log x,. -log x)2 (7) Coliform counts of zero present a problem with the use of the lognormal distribution. One solution is to use the lognormal distribution with added zeros (sometimes called the delta distribution).…”
Section: Distributions Consideredmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lated over the past 10 years in favor of the molecular filter membrane technique (1)(2)(3)(4) . Eliassen (3) emphasizes precision as the major advantage of the MF method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative coliform recovery or the ratio of the median MF to the median MPN was 0.92. With adjustment (MPN X 0.81) for bias(2), the relative coli-MF form recovery MPN was 1.13. Overall average.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%