1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0029(19980101)40:1<22::aid-jemt4>3.0.co;2-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of microscopical techniques in the study of human chondrocytes from osteoarthritic cartilage: An overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(28 reference statements)
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although little difference in cytoskeletal distribution was seen in this study between non-osteoarthritic and osteoarthritic cells, previous studies with electron and confocal microscopy showed cytoskeletal alterations that were associated with cartilage degeneration. Previous studies have described multiple cell types in normal and diseased cartilage, showing that "clonal cells" found in fibrillated cartilage had varying amounts of cytoskeletal actin and vimentin, as opposed to the non-clonal (i.e., "normal") cells, which always displayed relatively constant amounts of these cytoskeletal proteins [29]. It is important to note that osteoarthritic cartilage is generally lacking a surface, or superficial zone, suggesting that the population of cells studied in this case includes a greater proportion of middle or deep zone cells as compared to non-osteoarthritic cartilage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although little difference in cytoskeletal distribution was seen in this study between non-osteoarthritic and osteoarthritic cells, previous studies with electron and confocal microscopy showed cytoskeletal alterations that were associated with cartilage degeneration. Previous studies have described multiple cell types in normal and diseased cartilage, showing that "clonal cells" found in fibrillated cartilage had varying amounts of cytoskeletal actin and vimentin, as opposed to the non-clonal (i.e., "normal") cells, which always displayed relatively constant amounts of these cytoskeletal proteins [29]. It is important to note that osteoarthritic cartilage is generally lacking a surface, or superficial zone, suggesting that the population of cells studied in this case includes a greater proportion of middle or deep zone cells as compared to non-osteoarthritic cartilage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Pre-incubation was performed with 0.2% IgG-free bovine serum albumin (Sigma Chemical Co., St Luis, MO) for 20 min at room temperature. Overnight incubation at 4°C with primary antibodies was followed by FITC-tagged anti-mouse and FITC-tagged antirabbit, respectively (6 µg/ml in PBS, Santa Cruz Biotechnology; Santa Cruz, California), for 1 h at room temperature [26,27]. Negative control was achieved by excluding the corresponding primary antibodies from the reaction and Vero cells, which are a fibroblastic cell line, were used as positive control.…”
Section: Immunofluorescencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that different phases of mitosis have never been reported in OA cartilage make us to doubt the existence of chondrocyte cell division (at least in its classical mode) and, consequently, the existence of cell proliferation in OA. We also wondered if OA chondrocytes might remain quiescent at G 2 phase of cell cycle, as previously suggested [13][14][15]. In order to clarify the lost of mitosis phases within the OA cartilage and in turn to ascertain cell proliferation, new strategies are required and the number of chondrocytes within the OA cartilage, as compared to the normal tissue, should also be assessed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Several hypothesis have been advanced to explain the accumulation of these filaments which include: excessive protein pool, degeneration of intracellular components and modification of cytoskeleton in OA. [12][13][14] Meachin (or Meachim?) and Roy stated that such gross deposits probably indicate a degenerative change.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%