2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.clpt.2006.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of microdosing to predict pharmacokinetics at the therapeutic dose: Experience with 5 drugs

Abstract: Overall, when used appropriately, microdosing offers the potential to aid in early drug candidate selection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
244
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 224 publications
(249 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
244
3
Order By: Relevance
“…dose at the T max of the oral dose determines i.v. pharmacokinetics at therapeutically relevant concentrations of the compound, thereby addressing concerns regarding pharmacokinetic linearity of the microdose, and improves precision of the bioavailability estimate due to the lack of interoccasion variability 8, 9, 10, 11…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…dose at the T max of the oral dose determines i.v. pharmacokinetics at therapeutically relevant concentrations of the compound, thereby addressing concerns regarding pharmacokinetic linearity of the microdose, and improves precision of the bioavailability estimate due to the lack of interoccasion variability 8, 9, 10, 11…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The microtracer approach, where doses are typically 1/100th to 1/1,000th of the therapeutic dose (or ≤100 μg), and, in cases in which radioisotopes are administered, radioactivity is <1,000 nCi, provides several advantages over traditional methods 8, 9, 10, 11. If the radioactive dose administered is very low (<1,000 nCi), subjects are exposed to extremely low amounts of radiation; therefore, supporting data from dosimetry studies in animals are not required 8.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because these doses are far below the no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) it is an attractive approach to assess a drug's propensity to exert pharmacokinetic drug interactions in early drug development and also in vulnerable populations. To be useful and predictive, it needs systematic validation to show dose linearity [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of a wider strategy to address the current high rate of attrition for new chemical entities that proceed to clinical development, both the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have issued guidance documents to support the use of exploratory (Phase 0) studies in the early evaluation of the PK and PD properties of such compounds in humans [25,26,28].In this regard, an emerging literature reveals how microdose studies using highly sensitive analytical methods, namely LC/MS/MS and accelerator MS (AMS) can be used to extrapolate the PK profile of compounds and metabolites (assuming linearity of exposure with dose) to higher clinically relevant doses [22,27,[29][30][31]. However, few microdose investigations have been reported specifically in the context of drug development and their value to the overall process has yet to be fully established [20,22,23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second consideration is that there may be a lack of agreement between the PK profile seen following microdose administration and that seen at higher doses, which may reflect non-linearity in absorption, distribution, metabolism and/or excretion over the dose range [20,22]. To date, a formal comparison of microdose with therapeutic dose PK data has only been undertaken in the clinical setting for a few established drugs of limited chemical diversity [27,29,49], so the predictive value of the methodology has yet to be fully defined. It also remains to be seen whether the scope of application of microdose data, when combined with human in vitro data, might be usefully broadened to update the assumptions underpinning physiologically-based PK (PBPK) models and thereby enhancing their predictive value [50].…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%