2017
DOI: 10.18203/2349-2902.isj20175879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of methylene blue for the detection of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is the widely acceptable method for the examination of the breast cancer in the patients. This biopsy is considered as the best method for identifying the axillary involvement. Various dyes are used in this biopsy to find the sentinel lymph node. However, methylene blue dye (MBD) is considered to have a low risk of anaphylaxis, be cost effective and widely available.A systematic review and meta-analysis is performed on the utilisation of the methylene blue dye in the sentinel lymph n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The low variability between two scorers illustrates that this visual assessment can be done by different observers and still yield the same score given to a sample. We hypothesize that the variability in scores between observers is seen when lymph node tissue coloration is ambiguous, if image quality is poor or due to differences in the learning curve ( 75 , 76 ) to discern blue staining. The intraobserver agreement of scores in our study are near perfect and scores did not even vary when the blinded observer scored the randomized images in batches at a different time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low variability between two scorers illustrates that this visual assessment can be done by different observers and still yield the same score given to a sample. We hypothesize that the variability in scores between observers is seen when lymph node tissue coloration is ambiguous, if image quality is poor or due to differences in the learning curve ( 75 , 76 ) to discern blue staining. The intraobserver agreement of scores in our study are near perfect and scores did not even vary when the blinded observer scored the randomized images in batches at a different time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Several studies have also reported that subareolar and periareolar injections promote higher SLN identification rates compared to peritumoral injections. [9][10][11][12] The optimal methylene blue dosage for SLNB remains controversial, with the most commonly used dosages being 2 and 5 ml. 13,14 Accordingly, Brahma et al, 5 who used 5 ml of methylene blue injected at the subareolar or peritumoral areas, obtained an SN detection rate of 91.7%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,45 Adverse events related to performing leak testing were not well documented in any of the studies included in this review, with only Ijichi et al commenting on a single adverse event -common bile duct injury on insertion of the catheter with successful repair and uneventful postoperative recovery. 23 There is evidence that test substances used can cause allergic reactions, 47,48 and for the white test in particular, risks include fat embolie, immunosuppressive effects and fungal infection, 22,49 although all these are rare. The risk of barotrauma during dye injection, resulting in breakage of biliary ligatures, and resulting in either bile leakage, or reflux cholangitis has also been noted in the literature.…”
Section: Limitations Of Bile Leak Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%