Use of Meta-narrative Review to Integrate Perspectives on Identity Formation in the Cameroonian and Swedish-Kurdish Diasporas

The ontology, origin, and impact of divisive public sector rules: A meta‐narrative review of the red tape and administrative burden literatures

“…The meta-narrative review methodology grew out of Greenhalgh and colleagues' work in public health(Greenhalgh et al, 2004(Greenhalgh et al, , 2009. The methodology has also been applied to a diverse set of topics including research methodology(Vachon et al, 2021), family psychology(Helps & Grinney), library sciences(Vaidya et al, 2021), migration and culture(Colverson, 2021), service work(Schneider et al, 2022), sport(Hwang & Henry, 2021), and numerous other areas.2 The data, on which this review study is based, are available on github(Campbell, Pandey, and Arnesen 2022).3 Although green tape and administrative exclusion are distinct concepts, we include them in the red tape and administrative burden categories, respectively, for a number of reasons. While five studies in our dataset mention "green tape" in the title or abstract (and three without also mentioning "red tape"), green tape studies generally cite core red tape research both liberally and meaningfully, and the red tape concept plays a non-trivial role in theory generation.…”

“…1 1 The meta‐narrative review methodology grew out of Greenhalgh and colleagues' work in public health (Greenhalgh et al, 2004, 2009). The methodology has also been applied to a diverse set of topics including research methodology (Vachon et al, 2021), family psychology (Helps & Grinney), library sciences (Vaidya et al, 2021), migration and culture (Colverson, 2021), service work (Schneider et al, 2022), sport (Hwang & Henry, 2021), and numerous other areas. …”