DOI: 10.31274/rtd-180813-1721
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of male-sterility for increasing the population tolerance of corn (Zea mays L)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
12
1

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
3
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between years was not due entirely to the different hybrids used, since the average barrenness for the seven barrenness by some tolerant genotypes as exemplified by A632 X A619 and 336 x 029. These results are in agreement with the work of Schwanke(1965) andMeyer (1970). B37, which was the most intolerant inbred, had much higher barrenness for the Tcms versions, demonstrating that the response to male sterility is dependent on genotype.Several researchers have found a high correlation between yield andbarrenness at high populations.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference between years was not due entirely to the different hybrids used, since the average barrenness for the seven barrenness by some tolerant genotypes as exemplified by A632 X A619 and 336 x 029. These results are in agreement with the work of Schwanke(1965) andMeyer (1970). B37, which was the most intolerant inbred, had much higher barrenness for the Tcms versions, demonstrating that the response to male sterility is dependent on genotype.Several researchers have found a high correlation between yield andbarrenness at high populations.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The time between anthesis and silking lengthens as population increases (Kiesselbach, 1950;Dungan et al, 1958;Thom, 1951b, Sass andLoeffel, 1959;Moss and Stinson, 1961;Woolley et al, 1962;Schwanke, 1965;Cardwell, 1967;Meyer, 1970) and intolerant hybrids have a longer delay than those more tolerant (Moss and Stinson, 1961;Schwanke, 1965;Earley et al, 1967;Meyer, 1970). Lonnquist and Jugenheimer (1943) and Sass and Loeffel (1959) (Barr, 1939;Loomis, 1935;Kiesselbach, 1948;Moss and Stinson, 1961;Moss, 1962).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also observed that during the week prior to antheas 50% of the nitrogen accumulated by the plant was in the tasseL Other indirect lines of evidence sq>porting the competitive hypothesis are the results of experiments evaluating the effect of tassel size and male sterility on grain yield. Specially under adverse condidons, varieties that invest less dry matter in the formation of the staminate inflorescence (Mock and Schuetz, 1974) or that do not produce viable pollen (Meyer, 1970) tend to present hi^er grain yield.…”
Section: The Tassel As a Competitive Sinkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lonnquist and Jugenheimer (1943) and Sass and Loeffel (1959) suggested that the primary cause of barrenness is the lengthening of the anthesis-to-siIking period, i.e., by the time late silks emerge, the pollen is not viable. The interval between anthesis and silking lengthens as plant density is increased (Kiesselbach, 1950;Dungan et al 1958;Shav;and Thorn, 1951 ;Wool ley et al 1962;Cardwell, 1967;Meyer, 1970;Buren, 1970;Fakorede, 1977). Additionally, Kohnke and Miles (1951) reported that silking was delayed approximately one day for every increase of 7,000 -8,000 plants/ha.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, Kohnke and Miles (1951) reported that silking was delayed approximately one day for every increase of 7,000 -8,000 plants/ha. Maize hybrids intolerant of high plant densities have a longer delay in silk emergence than those that are tolerant (Moss and Stinson, 1961;Schwanke, 1965;Earley et al, 1967;Meyer, 1970;Buren, 1970;El-Lakany and Russell, 1971;Mock and Buren, 1972;Buren et al, (1974); Fakorede, 1977).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%