2021
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.738466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Methods in Geriatric Mental Health Research Involving Electronic Health Record or Administrative Claims Data: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Introduction: Electronic health records (EHR) and administrative healthcare data (AHD) are frequently used in geriatric mental health research to answer various health research questions. However, there is an increasing amount and complexity of data available that may lend itself to alternative analytic approaches using machine learning (ML) or artificial intelligence (AI) methods. We performed a systematic review of the current application of ML or AI approaches to the analysis of EHR and AHD in geriatric men… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(136 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research in developing predictive models for conditions related to poor function has primarily concentrated on frailty or cognitive impairment 28,29 . These models have used both unstructured and structured EHR data elements and have achieved AUCs ranging from 0.7 to 0.9 18,30–32 . In contrast, our study is the first to focus on predicting impaired performance of daily living activities, utilizing only predictors available in structured patient data from the EHR, making data abstraction and analysis more feasible, reliable, timely, and lower cost compared to also using unstructured data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous research in developing predictive models for conditions related to poor function has primarily concentrated on frailty or cognitive impairment 28,29 . These models have used both unstructured and structured EHR data elements and have achieved AUCs ranging from 0.7 to 0.9 18,30–32 . In contrast, our study is the first to focus on predicting impaired performance of daily living activities, utilizing only predictors available in structured patient data from the EHR, making data abstraction and analysis more feasible, reliable, timely, and lower cost compared to also using unstructured data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0.9. 18,[30][31][32] In contrast, our study is the first to focus on predicting impaired performance of daily living activities, utilizing only predictors available in structured patient data from the EHR, making data abstraction and analysis more feasible, reliable, timely, and lower cost compared to also using unstructured data. Despite this difference, our results are comparable to those of previous models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Racial and ethnic diversity 23,24 and disease severity are known factors shaping the ability of algorithms to distinguish true positives 25 . Enduring concerns about the lack of consistent information provided across studies make it challenging to compare predictive modeling algorithms to analyze EHR and administrative data between studies in geriatric mental health 26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Enduring concerns about the lack of consistent information provided across studies make it challenging to compare predictive modeling algorithms to analyze EHR and administrative data between studies in geriatric mental health. 26 The prediction of recognized dementia, operationalized as a CCW diagnosis of ADRD, has implications for the measurement of cognitive impairment across postacute care settings and in home health specifically. Knox and colleagues developed a clinically informed equivalence between the Functional Assessment Staging Tool as a method for staging individuals with dementia using various OASIS items, and showed a significant relationship between increased severity and the risk of potentially preventable hospital readmission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 Summary of benefits and limitations of using electronic medical records. 2,3,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]16,33 risk, as determined by the Hospital Frailty Risk Score, have increased 30-day mortality, longer hospital stays and higher readmission rates, although the score's ability to differentiate outcomes at the individual level is limited. 16 This initial identification, however, can be useful in making decisions about follow-up care.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%