2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-018-1379-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of lymphoscintigraphy to differentiate primary versus secondary lower extremity lymphedema after surgical lymphadenectomy: a retrospective analysis

Abstract: BackgroundWhen managing patients with cancer, lymphedema of the lower limbs (LLL) is commonly reported as secondary to the surgical excision and/or irradiation of lymph nodes (LNs). In the framework of lymphoscintigraphic imaging performed to evaluate secondary LLL, some lympho-nodal presentations have been observed that could not be explained by the applied treatments, suggesting that these LLL might be primary. Therefore, all our lymphoscintigraphic examinations that were performed in patients for LLL after … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pelvic tumor surgery is traditionally characterized by several major complications, including secondary lower extremity lymphedema [1]. Cancer-related lower extremity lymphedema is associated with treatment modalities such as cancer surgery and radiation therapy, which can injure or remove the lymph nodes [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pelvic tumor surgery is traditionally characterized by several major complications, including secondary lower extremity lymphedema [1]. Cancer-related lower extremity lymphedema is associated with treatment modalities such as cancer surgery and radiation therapy, which can injure or remove the lymph nodes [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second, no LNs could be observed, although they had been observed previously. In the third, the tracer flowed up to the root of the limb[s], sometimes revealing LNs, but to a lesser extent than could be, for example, expected in cases of secondary LLLE, especially when considering the bilaterality of the lymphadenectomies performed and the number of LNs that had been surgically removed [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The true incidence of LLL after surgical treatment of cervical cancer is unclear, previously reported in the range of 0–62% [ 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. The incidence varies mainly according to the extent of the surgery and administration of adjuvant treatment [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. Namely, the number of removed lymph nodes has been shown to be directly related to the LLL development; however, the critical number of lymph nodes varied from 10 to 31 [ 9 , 15 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%