2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2009.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Lugol's iodine in the resection of oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
58
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our cohort study data show a reduction in margin dysplasia using Lugol’s iodine at cancer resection from 32% for control to 4% for intervention groups [12]. Our feasibility study showed very high patient acceptance rates (unpublished data) and we are very optimistic that this trial will recruit participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Our cohort study data show a reduction in margin dysplasia using Lugol’s iodine at cancer resection from 32% for control to 4% for intervention groups [12]. Our feasibility study showed very high patient acceptance rates (unpublished data) and we are very optimistic that this trial will recruit participants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For example, we applied Lugol's iodine staining [1416] and titanium seed marker implantation [18] to estimate the extension of the tumor (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implantation was performed under general anesthesia in all patients except one, who received local anesthesia because of insufficient pulmonary function. Inspection and palpation was performed by more than two physicians and Lugol's iodine staining was performed to estimate the superficial extension of the tumor [1416]. Intraoral ultrasonography (SSD-1000 ® ; Hitachi Aloka Medical Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was performed to define tumor thickness [17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A set of criteria for assessing margin clearance was identified (table 2) [14,15,16,17,18] based on accepted cytological features of malignancy, after sequentially checking each imprint from the mucosal margins for adequacy, cellular arrangement, tumor diathesis and high/variable nuclear to cytoplasmic ratio in an order. The margins were reported as ‘suspicious’ (increased nuclear cytoplasmic ratio + presence of one or more features from category 1), ‘positive’ (increased nuclear cytoplasmic ratio + presence of at least two features from category 1 + any 1 feature from category 2) and ‘negative’ (absence of epithelial cells in imprints or absence of all of the above-mentioned features in cells present in imprints).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%