2001 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37221)
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2001.940915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of local kurtosis measure for spotting usable speech segments in co-channel speech

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, we found that features which were originally designed for a different purpose can also play a role in crosstalk analysis (e.g., "fundamentalness" [14]). Furthermore, features which have previously been used to identify overlapping speakers such as MFCCs, PPF [16], and SAPVR (e.g., [8]) were rejected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, we found that features which were originally designed for a different purpose can also play a role in crosstalk analysis (e.g., "fundamentalness" [14]). Furthermore, features which have previously been used to identify overlapping speakers such as MFCCs, PPF [16], and SAPVR (e.g., [8]) were rejected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They demonstrated that the kurtosis of overlapped speech is generally less than the kurtosis of isolated utterances, since-in accordance with the central limit theorem-mixtures of speech signals will tend toward a Gaussian distribution. This statistical property has also been used to identify reliable frames for speaker identification in the presence of an interfering talker [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kurtosis has been reported as an effective measure for detecting the presence of multiple-speakers in co-channel signals in numerous studies [5,4,19]. It is well-known that overlapped-speech signals exhibit lower kurtosis compared to single-speaker speech signals [20].…”
Section: Kurtosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Spectral autocorrelation peak-to-valley ratio (SAPVR) [39,40] • Local kurtosis [41] • Adjacent pitch period comparison (APPC) [42] • Cyclostationarity and wavelet transform [43] • Linear predictive analysis [44,45] • Difference-mean comparison (DMC) and nodal density (ND) [46] To ensure that an efficient usable speech detection system was developed, several usable speech detection features containing complementary information were fused [38,47]. As a result, the overall performance of the detection system was enhanced.…”
Section: Previous Work 25mentioning
confidence: 99%