Use of LCA as a development tool within early research: challenges and issues across different sectors

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to highlight the challenges that face the use of life cycle assessment (LCA) for the development of emerging technologies. LCA has great potential for driving the development of products and processes with improved environmental credentials when used at the early research stage, not only to compare novel processing with existing commercial alternatives, but to help identify environmental hotspots. Its use in this way does however provide methodological and practical difficulties, often exacerbated by the speed of analysis required to enable development decisions to be made. Awareness and understanding of the difficulties in such cases is vital for all involved with the development cycle. Method This paper employs three case studies across the diverse sectors of nanotechnology, lignocellulosic ethanol (biofuel), and novel food processes, demonstrating both the synergy of issues across different sectors and highlighting the challenges when applying LCA for early research. Whilst several researchers have previously highlighted some of the issues with use of LCA techniques at early-stage, most have focused on a specific product, process development, or sector. The use of the three case studies here is specifically designed to highlight conclusively that such issues are prevalent to use of LCA in early research irrespective of the technology being assessed. Results The four focus areas for the paper are; system boundaries, scaling issues, data availability and uncertainty. Whilst some of the issues identified will be familiar to all LCA practitioners as problems shared with standard LCAs, their importance and difficulty is compounded by factors distinct to novel processes as emerging technology is often associated with unknown future applications, unknown industrial scales, and wider data gaps that contribute to the level of LCA uncertainty. These issues, in addition with others that are distinct to novel applications, such as the challenges of comparing laboratory scale data with well established commercial processing, are exacerbated by the requirement for rapid analysis to enable development decisions to be made. Conclusions Based on the challenges and issues highlighted via illustration through the three case studies, it is clear that whilst transparency of information is paramount for standard LCAs, the sensitivities, complexities and uncertainties surrounding LCAs for early research are critical. Full reporting and understanding of these must be established prior to utilising such data as part of the development cycle.

For the sustainable performance of the carbon reduction labeling policies under an evolutionary game simulation

“…However, the complexities of lifecycle assessment and difficulties obtaining a globally recognized protocol for standardized carbon footprint methodologies limit the accuracy of the calculated values (Cohen and Vandenbergh, 2012;Hetherington et al, 2014). For example, the main standards related to Table 3 Determination of preferential taxation policy.…”

Three Pillars of Novel Nonthermal Food Technologies: Food Safety, Quality, and Environment

“…Hospido et al [170] stress the difficulties in evaluating environmental impact of these technologies in terms of (i) the lack of real data for the inventory phase, which is often based on lab-scale information or theoretical data; (ii) the definition of the functional unit for comparative studies since new products or processes might have unique properties; and (iii) that manufacture of products or processes can be expected to start several years ahead and assumptions on surrounding systems will be required. Once the technologies are transferred from labs to real production plants, novel processing technologies can be compared with existing commercial alternatives and environmental hotspots can be identified [173].…”

Life Cycle Assessment and Risk Assessment of Manufactured Nanomaterials

“…This term was inspired by the technical change literature, where technologies are often referred to with regard to their level of maturity [29]. Similarly, Hetherington et al [30] refer to immature MNMs, products and technologies as being "emerging." This immature or emerging nature of many MNMs differentiates them from more mature substances and products (such as cement and cucumbers).…”