2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2007.10.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of layer silicate for protein crystallization: Effects of Micromica and chlorite powders in hanging drops

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, unfortunately, the quality of lysozyme crystals formed in the presence of F-Saps tends to be lower than those in the absence of the nucleant. Our results are consistent with the previous data, which showed that the growth speed of thaumatin crystal formed in the presence of layered silicate is inversely related to their quality [20].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, unfortunately, the quality of lysozyme crystals formed in the presence of F-Saps tends to be lower than those in the absence of the nucleant. Our results are consistent with the previous data, which showed that the growth speed of thaumatin crystal formed in the presence of layered silicate is inversely related to their quality [20].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…All the crystals, regardless of the absence/presence of F-Saps, belonged to the space group P4 3 2 1 2. Indeed, we previously reported no change in the space group of thaumatin crystals formed in the presence of layered silicate [20]. In terms of quality, each completeness and average I/Sigma from the crystals formed in the presence of F-Saps was lower than those obtained from the control.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The search for suitable materials which can induce and control nucleation of a wide variety of proteins, has been ongoing for over 30 years and a variety of approaches have been used to promote and control nucleation to obtain diffraction quality protein crystals [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] . These approaches include the effects of epitaxy, surface morphology, disordered porosity, surface roughness and surface chemistry, as well as the use of various crystalline and amorphous miscellaneous material 7,10,11,13,[16][17][18][19][20] . This work has offered little in terms of systematic methodological understanding, and most studies have been highly empirical in their approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other candidate nucleants followed like zeolites, silicates, charged surfaces, porous materials etc. and have been tested for multiple proteins (Sugahara et al, 2008, Takehara et al, 2008. Previous results showed that horsehair and dried seaweed showed increased hits when added to sparse-matrix crystallization trials.…”
Section: The Role Of Heterogeneous Substrates In the Process Of Protementioning
confidence: 99%