2021
DOI: 10.3390/en14206635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Kane’s Method for Multi-Body Dynamic Modelling and Control of Spar-Type Floating Offshore Wind Turbines

Abstract: This paper demonstrates the use of Kane’s method to derive equations of motion for a spar-type floating offshore wind turbine taking into account the flexibility of the members. The recently emerged Kane’s method reduces the effort required to derive equations of motion for complex multi-body systems, making them simpler to model and more readily solved by computers. Further, the installation procedure of external vibration control devices on the wind turbine using Kane’s method is described, and the ease of u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This system of equations is solved via MATLAB ® [24] employing the Runga-Kutta 4 th order method. For further details on the derivation of these equations, the reader can refer to Sarkar et al [25].…”
Section: Multi-body Structural Dynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system of equations is solved via MATLAB ® [24] employing the Runga-Kutta 4 th order method. For further details on the derivation of these equations, the reader can refer to Sarkar et al [25].…”
Section: Multi-body Structural Dynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For brevity, details of the 22 DOF system are not presented in this paper. The reader will find more details in [18].…”
Section: Proposed Observer Based Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) an inertial coordinate system z 1 z 2 z 3 that is established and fixed at a certain point at the sea surface; (2) a coordinate system a 1 a 2 a 3 that is attached to the tower base; (3) a coordinate system b 1 b 2 b 3 that is attached to the nacelle; (4) a coordinate system c 1 c 2 c 3 that is fixed to the low-speed shaft and rotated with it; (5) a coordinate system d 1 d 2 d 3 that is attached to the low-speed shaft and rotated with the nacelle in the yaw direction; (6) a coordinate system e 1 e 2 e 3 that is attached to the low-speed shaft and rotated in the tilt direction; (7) a coordinate system g 1 g 2 g 3 that is aligned with the rotor and rotated with it; and (8) a coordinate system f 1 f 2 f 3 that is attached to the blade and takes the cone angle of the blade into consideration [55,[76][77][78]. Although the deformation and vibration of important components in a HAWT could be described by the local coordinate system, the kinetic energy calculation shown in Equation (29) requires the local motions to be transferred into the inertial coordinate system of z 1 z 2 z 3 via rotational matrices [55].…”
Section: The Euler-lagrange Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%