2006
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/86.6.778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Item Response Analysis to Investigate Measurement Properties and Clinical Validity of Data for the Dynamic Gait Index

Abstract: Background and Purpose. The Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) is a standardized clinical assessment that aids in evaluating a subject’s ability to modify gait in response to changing demands. The purpose of this study was to use Rasch measurement theory to examine whether the DGI rating scale meets suggested psychometric guidelines, whether the hierarchical order of DGI tasks is consistent with a clinically logical testing procedure, and whether the DGI represents a unidimensional construct. Subjects. Subjects were 84 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Huisstede et al (2009) also noted a lack of relevance of several items to the neck and suggested caution in applying the DASH to neck pain patients without upper limb symptoms. Future studies may consider the value of an abbreviated version of the DASH for neck pain patients and a starting point could be to formally examine the construct validity of the DASH with a Rasch analysis, an increasingly popular method to examine validity of assessment tools (Chiu et al, 2006;Hsueh et al, 2006). Some preliminary suggestions in an informal sense, based on the results of this study, could be to retain activity items that were scored ≥2 by 50% or greater of the participants (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Huisstede et al (2009) also noted a lack of relevance of several items to the neck and suggested caution in applying the DASH to neck pain patients without upper limb symptoms. Future studies may consider the value of an abbreviated version of the DASH for neck pain patients and a starting point could be to formally examine the construct validity of the DASH with a Rasch analysis, an increasingly popular method to examine validity of assessment tools (Chiu et al, 2006;Hsueh et al, 2006). Some preliminary suggestions in an informal sense, based on the results of this study, could be to retain activity items that were scored ≥2 by 50% or greater of the participants (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic gait index (DGI): This is a performance-based assessment of gait, balance, and falls risk in older adults. 25,26 The DGI examines a patient’s ability to modify his/her gait in response to changing task demands. The test examines walking on level surface, walking with head turns, walking around and over obstacles, and climbing stairs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…History of falls, injurious falls and near falls Fear of falling [17,24,53,57,58] Physical Performance Measures (consider one or more of the following) Timed up and go (gait velocity measure): Time to rise from a chair, walk 3 m, turn around, walk back to the chair, turn around and sit back down [45,87] Cut-off scores for fall risk have been found to be >13-14 s in older adults [43,45,69] Time to perform and score <5 min Gait Abnormality Rating Scale-Modified (gait variability measure) 50-foot walk is videotaped to allow scoring using a 7-item observational and qualitative scale to detect abnormal gait patterns associated with fall risk, including gait variability [76] A score of less than or equal to 3 suggests minimal to no risk for falls, and scores of greater or equal to 9 are linked with risk for recurrent falls among community dwelling older adults [46] Time to perform and score <10 min [77] Four-Item Dynamic Gait Index (vestibular sensitive measure): Subject is graded on a 4-point scale on walking, walking with speed changes, walking with horizontal head turns and walking with vertical head movements [44,88] A score of less than 10 out of 12 indicates increased fall risk [44] This tool appears sensitive to the vestibular component of balance [89] Time to complete and score is <10 min [44] needed to validate assessment strategies in patients with haemophilia, an in-depth physical therapy evaluation of balance dysfunction in other populations includes assessment of cervical mobility, lower extremity range of motion and strength, trunk control, gait and higher level balance activities as well as the performance of a bedside vestibular exam [90,91]. It has been clearly demonstrated that rehabilitation can improve balance and gait, and decrease falls [2, 80,92], Research supports the use of exercise [91,92], and programmes that include more than one type of exercise (e.g.…”
Section: Fall History Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%