2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03944-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of intramedullary locking nail for displaced intraarticular fractures of the calcaneus: what is the evidence?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Use of intramedullary locking device (ILD) as minimal invasive technique to treat displaced intraarticular fracture was developed for reducing complications. Bernasconi et al [ 15 ] reported treating displaced intraarticular calcaneal fracture with ILD leads to satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, complication rates ranged between 5 and 30%, with wound infection, nerve entrapment symptoms, metalware irritation, and CRPS.ILD produced favorable clinical outcomes, but complications are still a problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of intramedullary locking device (ILD) as minimal invasive technique to treat displaced intraarticular fracture was developed for reducing complications. Bernasconi et al [ 15 ] reported treating displaced intraarticular calcaneal fracture with ILD leads to satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, complication rates ranged between 5 and 30%, with wound infection, nerve entrapment symptoms, metalware irritation, and CRPS.ILD produced favorable clinical outcomes, but complications are still a problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomechanically, both commercially available ILDs achieve satisfactory primary stability and in terms of absolute values and when compared to locking plates 26,28 . From a clinical standpoint, after using ILDs partial weightbearing can be allowed after an average of 3 weeks, with short-term AOFAS-AHS and VAS scores similar to more 'traditional' surgery but with a reduced trauma for soft tissues 39,40 . From the radiographic viewpoint, surgery utilising ILDs restores a Böhler angle close to reference values (between 22° and 50°) 40 , comparing well with values obtained after the extensile lateral approach (between 24° and 31°) 40 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existe gran disparidad en relación con los resultados obtenidos. 1 3 6 16 39 En los últimos años, ha estado en uso el espaciador de hidrogel de alcohol de polivinilo (Cartiva, Inc., Alpharetta, GA, EEUU), que actuaría como cartílago sintético en la cabeza del primer metatarsiano, pero el seguimiento a corto y mediano plazo 40 41 42 sólo entrega recomendaciones limitadas sobre el beneficio de su uso, como es, en general, en las técnicas de hemiartroplastias, sin estar libre de complicaciones como subsidencia y fragmentación del implante, infección y osteólisis. 43…”
Section: Técnicas No Preservativas ( Fig 6 )unclassified
“…There is great disparity in relation to the results obtained. 1 3 6 16 39 In recent years, the polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel spacer (Cartiva, Inc., Alpharetta, GA, US) has been used, which would act as synthetic cartilage in the head of the first metatarsal bone, but the short- and medium-term follow-ups 40 41 42 only provide limited recommendations on the benefit of its use, as it is, in general, in hemiarthroplasty techniques, and it is not free of complications such as implant subsidence and fragmentation, infection, and osteolysis. 43…”
Section: Non-joint-sparing Techniques ( Fig 6 )mentioning
confidence: 99%